Replies to critics

Carolina Sartorio

doi:10.1007/s11098-018-1060-4

Replies to critics

Carolina Sartorio

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

I respond to the critical comments by Randolph Clarke, Alfred Mele, and Derk Pereboom on my book Causation and Free Will. I discuss some features of the view that our freedom is exclusively based on actual causes, including the role played in it by absences of reasons, absence causation, modal facts, and finally some additional thoughts on how a compatibilist can respond to the manipulation argument for incompatibilism.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1545-1556
Number of pages	12
Journal	Philosophical Studies
Volume	175
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1060-4
State	Published - Jun 1 2018

Keywords

Absence causation
Causation
Compatibilism
Free will
Manipulation
Reasons-sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1007/s11098-018-1060-4

Cite this

@article{ad795e9ba8d2481c85a15d1337fb0ea3,

title = "Replies to critics",

abstract = "I respond to the critical comments by Randolph Clarke, Alfred Mele, and Derk Pereboom on my book Causation and Free Will. I discuss some features of the view that our freedom is exclusively based on actual causes, including the role played in it by absences of reasons, absence causation, modal facts, and finally some additional thoughts on how a compatibilist can respond to the manipulation argument for incompatibilism.",

keywords = "Absence causation, Causation, Compatibilism, Free will, Manipulation, Reasons-sensitivity",

author = "Carolina Sartorio",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature.",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s11098-018-1060-4",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "175",

pages = "1545--1556",

journal = "Philosophical Studies",

issn = "0031-8116",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Replies to critics

AU - Sartorio, Carolina

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - I respond to the critical comments by Randolph Clarke, Alfred Mele, and Derk Pereboom on my book Causation and Free Will. I discuss some features of the view that our freedom is exclusively based on actual causes, including the role played in it by absences of reasons, absence causation, modal facts, and finally some additional thoughts on how a compatibilist can respond to the manipulation argument for incompatibilism.

AB - I respond to the critical comments by Randolph Clarke, Alfred Mele, and Derk Pereboom on my book Causation and Free Will. I discuss some features of the view that our freedom is exclusively based on actual causes, including the role played in it by absences of reasons, absence causation, modal facts, and finally some additional thoughts on how a compatibilist can respond to the manipulation argument for incompatibilism.

KW - Absence causation

KW - Causation

KW - Compatibilism

KW - Free will

KW - Manipulation

KW - Reasons-sensitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042224924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042224924&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11098-018-1060-4

DO - 10.1007/s11098-018-1060-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042224924

SN - 0031-8116

VL - 175

SP - 1545

EP - 1556

JO - Philosophical Studies

JF - Philosophical Studies

IS - 6

ER -

Replies to critics

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this