Repetita iuvant! A reply to Gwilym Eades

Paul Kingsbury; John Paul Jones

doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.07.001

Repetita iuvant! A reply to Gwilym Eades

Paul Kingsbury
, John Paul Jones

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

We reply to Gwilym Eades's (2010) criticisms by emphasizing the dangers of predestined readings and restating three key points that we made in our previous article (Kingsbury and Jones, 2009): first, that Apollo and Dionysus are mutually affirming rather than oppositional; second, that Walter Benjamin provides valuable theoretical resources to consider the uncertainties and possibilities of technology; and third, that one cannot simply read politics off technology.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	674-676
Number of pages	3
Journal	Geoforum
Volume	41
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.07.001
State	Published - Sep 2010

Keywords

Friedrich Nietzsche
Geospatial technology
Google Earth
Walter Benjamin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sociology and Political Science

Access to Document

10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.07.001

Cite this

@article{859d9cc7294e404bab363d2dea73bc67,

title = "Repetita iuvant! A reply to Gwilym Eades",

abstract = "We reply to Gwilym Eades's (2010) criticisms by emphasizing the dangers of predestined readings and restating three key points that we made in our previous article (Kingsbury and Jones, 2009): first, that Apollo and Dionysus are mutually affirming rather than oppositional; second, that Walter Benjamin provides valuable theoretical resources to consider the uncertainties and possibilities of technology; and third, that one cannot simply read politics off technology.",

keywords = "Friedrich Nietzsche, Geospatial technology, Google Earth, Walter Benjamin",

author = "Paul Kingsbury and \{Paul Jones\}, John",

year = "2010",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.07.001",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "41",

pages = "674--676",

journal = "Geoforum",

issn = "0016-7185",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repetita iuvant! A reply to Gwilym Eades

AU - Kingsbury, Paul

AU - Paul Jones, John

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - We reply to Gwilym Eades's (2010) criticisms by emphasizing the dangers of predestined readings and restating three key points that we made in our previous article (Kingsbury and Jones, 2009): first, that Apollo and Dionysus are mutually affirming rather than oppositional; second, that Walter Benjamin provides valuable theoretical resources to consider the uncertainties and possibilities of technology; and third, that one cannot simply read politics off technology.

AB - We reply to Gwilym Eades's (2010) criticisms by emphasizing the dangers of predestined readings and restating three key points that we made in our previous article (Kingsbury and Jones, 2009): first, that Apollo and Dionysus are mutually affirming rather than oppositional; second, that Walter Benjamin provides valuable theoretical resources to consider the uncertainties and possibilities of technology; and third, that one cannot simply read politics off technology.

KW - Friedrich Nietzsche

KW - Geospatial technology

KW - Google Earth

KW - Walter Benjamin

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77956189005

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77956189005#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.07.001

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:77956189005

SN - 0016-7185

VL - 41

SP - 674

EP - 676

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

IS - 5

ER -

Repetita iuvant! A reply to Gwilym Eades

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this