TY - JOUR
T1 - Repeated selection of alternatively adapted haplotypes creates sweeping genomic remodeling in stickleback
AU - Bassham, Susan
AU - Catchen, Julian
AU - Lescak, Emily
AU - von Hippel, Frank A.
AU - Cresko, William A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank M. S. Christy, S. A. Hatch, B. Lohman, V. M. Padula, L. Smayda, and K. Walton for assistance with fieldwork logistics and fish collection; T. Wilson and M. Currey for technical help; P. Hohenlohe for discussions during early stages of the development of the project; members of the W.A.C., P. C. Phillips, and M. A. Streisfeld laboratories at the University of Oregon for discussions and critical comments; and Genetics associate editor J. Novembre and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable input. This research was supported primarily by National Science Foundation DEB 0949053 and IOS 102728 (to W.A.C.) and DEB 0919234 (to F.A.v.H.). Additional support came from NIH Grant 1R24GM079486-01A1 (to W.A.C.), NIH NRSA Ruth L. Kirschstein Fellowship F32GM095213-01 (to J.C.). E.A.L. was supported with funds from NIH Institutional Development Award (IDeA) P20GM103395.
Funding Information:
We thank M. S. Christy, S. A. Hatch, B. Lohman, V. M. Padula, L. Smayda, and K. Walton for assistance with fieldwork logistics and fish collection; T. Wilson and M. Currey for technical help; P. Hohenlohe for discussions during early stages of the development of the project; members of the W.A.C., P. C. Phillips, and M. A. Streisfeld laboratories at the University of Oregon for discussions and critical comments; and Genetics associate editor J. Novembre and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable input. This research was supported primarily by National Science FoundationDEB 0949053 and IOS 102728 (to W.A.C.) and DEB 0919234 (to F.A.v.H.). Additional support came from NIH Grant 1R24GM079486-01A1 (to W.A.C.), NIH NRSA Ruth L. Kirschstein Fellowship F32GM095213-01 (to J.C.). E.A.L. was supported with funds from NIH Institutional Development Award (IDeA) P20GM103395.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Heterogeneous genetic divergence can accumulate across the genome when populations adapt to different habitats while still exchanging alleles. How long does diversification take and how much of the genome is affected? When divergence occurs in parallel from standing genetic variation, how often are the same haplotypes involved? We explore these questions using restriction site-associated DNA sequencing genotyping data and show that broad-scale genomic repatterning, fueled by copious standing variation, can emerge in just dozens of generations in replicate natural populations of threespine stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus). After the catastrophic 1964 Alaskan earthquake, marine stickleback colonized newly created ponds on seismically uplifted islands. We find that freshwater fish in these young ponds differ from their marine ancestors across the same genomic segments previously shown to have diverged in much older lake populations. Outside of these core divergent regions the genome shows no population structure across the ocean–freshwater divide, consistent with strong local selection acting in alternative environments on stickleback populations still connected by significant gene flow. Reinforcing this inference, a majority of divergent haplotypes that are at high frequency in ponds are detectable in the sea, even across great geographic distances. Building upon previous population genomics work in this model species, our data suggest that a long history of divergent selection and gene flow among stickleback populations in oceanic and freshwater habitats has maintained polymorphisms of alternatively adapted DNA sequences that facilitate parallel evolution.
AB - Heterogeneous genetic divergence can accumulate across the genome when populations adapt to different habitats while still exchanging alleles. How long does diversification take and how much of the genome is affected? When divergence occurs in parallel from standing genetic variation, how often are the same haplotypes involved? We explore these questions using restriction site-associated DNA sequencing genotyping data and show that broad-scale genomic repatterning, fueled by copious standing variation, can emerge in just dozens of generations in replicate natural populations of threespine stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus). After the catastrophic 1964 Alaskan earthquake, marine stickleback colonized newly created ponds on seismically uplifted islands. We find that freshwater fish in these young ponds differ from their marine ancestors across the same genomic segments previously shown to have diverged in much older lake populations. Outside of these core divergent regions the genome shows no population structure across the ocean–freshwater divide, consistent with strong local selection acting in alternative environments on stickleback populations still connected by significant gene flow. Reinforcing this inference, a majority of divergent haplotypes that are at high frequency in ponds are detectable in the sea, even across great geographic distances. Building upon previous population genomics work in this model species, our data suggest that a long history of divergent selection and gene flow among stickleback populations in oceanic and freshwater habitats has maintained polymorphisms of alternatively adapted DNA sequences that facilitate parallel evolution.
KW - Contemporary evolution
KW - Ecological divergence
KW - Gasterosteus aculeatus
KW - Population genomics
KW - Threespine stickleback
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049695761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049695761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1534/genetics.117.300610
DO - 10.1534/genetics.117.300610
M3 - Article
C2 - 29794240
AN - SCOPUS:85049695761
SN - 0016-6731
VL - 209
SP - 921
EP - 939
JO - Genetics
JF - Genetics
IS - 3
ER -