TY - JOUR
T1 - Registration of lung nodules using a semi-rigid model
T2 - Method and preliminary results
AU - Sun, Shaohua
AU - Rubin, Geoffrey D.
AU - Paik, David
AU - Steiner, Robert M.
AU - Zhuge, Feng
AU - Napel, Sandy
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to express their appreciation to Carl Crawford, of the Analogic Corporation, for providing the simulation software. We also thank Susan Wood, R2 Technology, Inc., and the grant NIH R01 CA109089 for the support.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - The tracking of lung nodules across computed tomography (CT) scans acquired at different times for the same patient is helpful for the determination of malignancy. We are developing a nodule registration system to facilitate this process. We propose to use a semi-rigid method that considers principal structures surrounding the nodule and allows relative movements among the structures. The proposed similarity metric, which evaluates both the image correlation and the degree of elastic deformation amongst the structures, is maximized by a two-layered optimization method, employing a simulated annealing framework. We tested our method by simulating five cases that represent physiological deformation as well as different nodule shape/size changes with time. Each case is made up of a source and target scan, where the source scan consists of a nodule-free patient CT volume into which we inserted ten simulated lung nodules, and the target scan is the result of applying a known, physiologically based nonrigid transformation to the nodule-free source scan, into which we inserted modified versions of the corresponding nodules at the same, known locations. Five different modification strategies were used, one for each of the five cases: (1) nodules maintain size and shape, (2) nodules disappear, (3) nodules shrink uniformly by a factor of 2, (4) nodules grow uniformly by a factor of 2, and (5) nodules grow nonuniformly. We also matched 97 real nodules in pairs of scans (acquired at different times) from 12 patients and compared our registration to a radiologist's visual determination. In the simulation experiments, the mean absolute registration errors were 1.0±0.8 mm (s.d.), 1.1±0.7 mm (s.d.), 1.0±0.7 mm (s.d.), 1.0±0.6 mm (s.d.), and 1.1±0.9 mm (s.d.) for the five cases, respectively. For the 97 nodule pairs in 12 patient scans, the mean absolute registration error was 1.4±0.8 mm (s.d.).
AB - The tracking of lung nodules across computed tomography (CT) scans acquired at different times for the same patient is helpful for the determination of malignancy. We are developing a nodule registration system to facilitate this process. We propose to use a semi-rigid method that considers principal structures surrounding the nodule and allows relative movements among the structures. The proposed similarity metric, which evaluates both the image correlation and the degree of elastic deformation amongst the structures, is maximized by a two-layered optimization method, employing a simulated annealing framework. We tested our method by simulating five cases that represent physiological deformation as well as different nodule shape/size changes with time. Each case is made up of a source and target scan, where the source scan consists of a nodule-free patient CT volume into which we inserted ten simulated lung nodules, and the target scan is the result of applying a known, physiologically based nonrigid transformation to the nodule-free source scan, into which we inserted modified versions of the corresponding nodules at the same, known locations. Five different modification strategies were used, one for each of the five cases: (1) nodules maintain size and shape, (2) nodules disappear, (3) nodules shrink uniformly by a factor of 2, (4) nodules grow uniformly by a factor of 2, and (5) nodules grow nonuniformly. We also matched 97 real nodules in pairs of scans (acquired at different times) from 12 patients and compared our registration to a radiologist's visual determination. In the simulation experiments, the mean absolute registration errors were 1.0±0.8 mm (s.d.), 1.1±0.7 mm (s.d.), 1.0±0.7 mm (s.d.), 1.0±0.6 mm (s.d.), and 1.1±0.9 mm (s.d.) for the five cases, respectively. For the 97 nodule pairs in 12 patient scans, the mean absolute registration error was 1.4±0.8 mm (s.d.).
KW - Lung nodule registration
KW - Semi-rigid method
KW - Two-layered optimization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846628969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846628969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1118/1.2432073
DO - 10.1118/1.2432073
M3 - Article
C2 - 17388179
AN - SCOPUS:33846628969
SN - 0094-2405
VL - 34
SP - 613
EP - 626
JO - Medical physics
JF - Medical physics
IS - 2
ER -