TY - JOUR
T1 - Regionalization of trauma care by operative experience
T2 - Does the volume of emergent laparotomy matter?
AU - Tang, Andrew
AU - Chehab, Mohamad
AU - Ditillo, Michael
AU - Asmar, Samer
AU - Khurrum, Muhammad
AU - Douglas, Molly
AU - Bible, Letitia
AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong
AU - Joseph, Bellal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - INTRODUCTION The volume-outcome relationship led to the regionalization of trauma care. The relationship between trauma centers' injury-specific laparotomy volume and outcomes has not been explored. The aim of our study was to examine the relationship between a trauma center's injury-specific laparotomy volume and outcomes in blunt and penetrating trauma patients. METHODS We performed a (2017) analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. We included adult (age, =18 years) blunt and penetrating trauma patients who required emergent laparotomies for hemorrhage control. Trauma centers were stratified based on their blunt and penetrating laparotomy volumes: High volume (HV), =25 cases per year; medium volume (MV), 13 to 24 cases per year; and low volume (LV), =12 cases per year. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to explore predictors of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS A total of 8,588 patients underwent emergent laparotomy for either blunt (4,936; 57.5%) or penetrating injuries (3,652; 42.5%). Overall, mean ± SD age was 40 ± 17 years, abdomen Abbreviated Injury Scale was 3 (2-4), and Injury Severity Score was 26 (17-35). For American College of Surgeons (ACS) level I centers, 50% were HV; 29%, MV; and 21%, LV. For ACS level II centers, 7% were HV; 23%, MV; and 70%, LV. For ACS level III centers, 100% were LV. On multivariate regression analysis, admission of blunt and penetrating trauma patients to HV blunt and HV penetrating centers, respectively, was independently associated with improved in-hospital mortality. High-volume blunt centers had a significantly lower time to laparotomy (72 [41-144] minutes) versus MV (81 [49-145] minutes) and LV (94 [56-158] minutes) centers (p < 0.001). The same trend was observed for HV penetrating trauma centers (35 [24-52] minutes) versus MV (46 [33-63] minutes) and LV (51 [38-69] minutes) centers (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Blunt and penetrating injury patients requiring emergent laparotomy had higher survival when admitted to trauma centers with HV operative experience for their particular mechanism of injury. The regionalization of trauma care should be based on a thorough evaluation of trauma centers' injury-specific operative experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic, Level III; Therapeutic/Care management, Level IV.
AB - INTRODUCTION The volume-outcome relationship led to the regionalization of trauma care. The relationship between trauma centers' injury-specific laparotomy volume and outcomes has not been explored. The aim of our study was to examine the relationship between a trauma center's injury-specific laparotomy volume and outcomes in blunt and penetrating trauma patients. METHODS We performed a (2017) analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. We included adult (age, =18 years) blunt and penetrating trauma patients who required emergent laparotomies for hemorrhage control. Trauma centers were stratified based on their blunt and penetrating laparotomy volumes: High volume (HV), =25 cases per year; medium volume (MV), 13 to 24 cases per year; and low volume (LV), =12 cases per year. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to explore predictors of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS A total of 8,588 patients underwent emergent laparotomy for either blunt (4,936; 57.5%) or penetrating injuries (3,652; 42.5%). Overall, mean ± SD age was 40 ± 17 years, abdomen Abbreviated Injury Scale was 3 (2-4), and Injury Severity Score was 26 (17-35). For American College of Surgeons (ACS) level I centers, 50% were HV; 29%, MV; and 21%, LV. For ACS level II centers, 7% were HV; 23%, MV; and 70%, LV. For ACS level III centers, 100% were LV. On multivariate regression analysis, admission of blunt and penetrating trauma patients to HV blunt and HV penetrating centers, respectively, was independently associated with improved in-hospital mortality. High-volume blunt centers had a significantly lower time to laparotomy (72 [41-144] minutes) versus MV (81 [49-145] minutes) and LV (94 [56-158] minutes) centers (p < 0.001). The same trend was observed for HV penetrating trauma centers (35 [24-52] minutes) versus MV (46 [33-63] minutes) and LV (51 [38-69] minutes) centers (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Blunt and penetrating injury patients requiring emergent laparotomy had higher survival when admitted to trauma centers with HV operative experience for their particular mechanism of injury. The regionalization of trauma care should be based on a thorough evaluation of trauma centers' injury-specific operative experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic, Level III; Therapeutic/Care management, Level IV.
KW - Blunt
KW - Laparotomy
KW - Penetrating
KW - Trauma
KW - Volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097664458&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097664458&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002911
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002911
M3 - Article
C2 - 32925573
AN - SCOPUS:85097664458
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 90
SP - 11
EP - 20
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 1
ER -