TY - JOUR
T1 - Reframing the Racialization of Disabilities in Policy
AU - Kramarczuk Voulgarides, Catherine
AU - Tefera, Adai
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the support of the William T. Grant Foundation Grant Number 184607. The funding agency’s endorsement of the ideas expressed in this article should not be inferred. We also personally acknowledge the research grant team members that contributed to the thinking of the article: Alfredo Artiles, Sarah Diaz, Lisa Jackson, and Alexandra Aylward.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University.
PY - 2017/7/3
Y1 - 2017/7/3
N2 - Racial disproportionality in special education is a deep seated and complex educational inequity plaguing the United States educational system. In this article we outline how the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, although a civil rights based legislation, cannot sufficiently address racially disproportionate outcomes in special education. We argue that mandating equity through technical and procedural mandates cannot attend to the sociocultural and social contexts in which policy is appropriated to practice. We outline how symbolic changes to educational practice do not account for the effects of personal biases and the complexities associated with how race manifests in society and within policy mandates. We conclude with recommendations for third order change (Welner, 2001), which challenges practitioners to not just comply with educational policy but, to also reflect on their own capacities, beliefs and understandings of disproportionality within broader social and cultural contexts.
AB - Racial disproportionality in special education is a deep seated and complex educational inequity plaguing the United States educational system. In this article we outline how the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, although a civil rights based legislation, cannot sufficiently address racially disproportionate outcomes in special education. We argue that mandating equity through technical and procedural mandates cannot attend to the sociocultural and social contexts in which policy is appropriated to practice. We outline how symbolic changes to educational practice do not account for the effects of personal biases and the complexities associated with how race manifests in society and within policy mandates. We conclude with recommendations for third order change (Welner, 2001), which challenges practitioners to not just comply with educational policy but, to also reflect on their own capacities, beliefs and understandings of disproportionality within broader social and cultural contexts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029948605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029948605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00405841.2017.1336037
DO - 10.1080/00405841.2017.1336037
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85029948605
VL - 56
SP - 161
EP - 168
JO - Theory into Practice
JF - Theory into Practice
SN - 0040-5841
IS - 3
ER -