Abstract
Despite the importance of establishing good, clear concept definitions in organizational research, the field lacks a comprehensive source that explains how to effectively develop and articulate a concept’s domain. Thus, the purpose of this article is to explain why clear conceptual definitions are essential for scientific progress and provide a concrete set of steps that researchers can follow to improve their conceptual definitions. First, we define what is meant by a concept, describe the functions served by concepts in scientific endeavors, and identify problems associated with a lack of conceptual clarity. Then we explain why it is so difficult to adequately define concepts. Next, we provide a series of recommendations for scholars in the organizational, behavioral, and social sciences who are either trying to define a new concept or revise the definition of one that already exists in the field. Following this, we provide some examples that generally meet the criteria for a good conceptual definition. We conclude with a set of questions that authors, reviewers, and editors can use as a guide for evaluating concept definitions.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 159-203 |
Number of pages | 45 |
Journal | Organizational Research Methods |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1 2016 |
Keywords
- concept
- construct
- contamination
- criteria for good conceptual definitions
- deficiency
- discriminant validity
- family resemblance concept structure
- necessary and sufficient concept structure
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Decision Sciences(all)
- Strategy and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation