TY - JOUR
T1 - Rationalizing patriarchy
T2 - gender, domestic violence, and law in Mexico
AU - Alonso, A. M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: The research on which this article is based was conducted between 1983 and 1985 with the financial support of the Social Science Research Council and the Inter-American Foundation and during the summer of 1989with the support of a Mellon Summer Grant, awarded by the Institute for Latin-American Studies,University of Texas,Austin. Ithank Jane Collier for having organized the American Anthropological Association panel in which a short version of this article was presented, for her efforts to get the proceedings of the panel published as a volume, and for her comments on this article. 1thank Daniel Nugent, Raquel Rubio Goldsmith, Luis Ricardo Alonso, and Ana Maria Z. de Alonso for their comments on drafts of this article.
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - National legislation criminalizing domestic violence and cases from the rural town of Namiquipa, Chihuahua, are examined in relation to broad processes of state formation and local practices in order to demonstrate the ways in which law was a site for the negotiation of identities and relations of power in 19th century Mexico. The paper argues that the criminalization of domestic violence in Mexico was part of a liberal process of nation-state formation that attempted to revolutionalize the legitimate bases of authority and redefine hegemonic forms of gender in both public and domestic spheres. However, legal changes rationalized rather than undermined patriarchy. -Author
AB - National legislation criminalizing domestic violence and cases from the rural town of Namiquipa, Chihuahua, are examined in relation to broad processes of state formation and local practices in order to demonstrate the ways in which law was a site for the negotiation of identities and relations of power in 19th century Mexico. The paper argues that the criminalization of domestic violence in Mexico was part of a liberal process of nation-state formation that attempted to revolutionalize the legitimate bases of authority and redefine hegemonic forms of gender in both public and domestic spheres. However, legal changes rationalized rather than undermined patriarchy. -Author
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029472177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029472177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962525
DO - 10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962525
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0029472177
SN - 1070-289X
VL - 2
SP - 29
EP - 47
JO - Identities
JF - Identities
IS - 1-2
ER -