TY - JOUR
T1 - Rasch model and its extensions for analysis of aphasic deficits in syntactic comprehension
AU - Gutman, Roee
AU - Dede, Gayle
AU - Caplan, David
AU - Liu, Jun S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Roee Gutman is Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912 (E-mail: [email protected]). Gayle DeDe is Assistant Professor, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences Department, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 (E-mail: gdede@email. arizona.edu). David Caplan is Professor, Neuropsychology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 (E-mail: dcaplan@patners. org). Jun Liu is Professor of Statistics, Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 (E-mail: [email protected]). This work was partially supported by NSF grants DMS-0907562 and DMS-0906545, as well as by NIDCD grant DC00942. The authors thank the editor, associate editor, and the referees for their valuable comments.
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - Aphasia is the loss of the ability to produce and/or comprehend language, due to injury to brain areas responsible for these functions. Aphasic patients' performance on comprehension tests has traditionally been related both to the patient's individual ability and to the difficulty of the test questions. The natural choice for analysis of these test results is the Rasch model. It assumes that the probability of a patient responding correctly to a question is the inverse-logit function of the difference between the individual patient's ability and the difficulty of the test question. This study first modeled the way aphasic patients process different sentence types, as well as their ability to accomplish tasks using Rasch models. However, several scientifically important features of the data, such as the correlation of correct responses between two different comprehension tasks, and the association between response patterns in control sentences and response patterns in experimental sentences, were found to be inadequately captured by such models. Alternatively, we used a full Bayesian approach, exploring a mixture of generalized linear mixed models that clustered patients into similar response patterns and abilities. The mixture model was found to better describe the experimental results than any other model examined. The mixture model also expresses the hypothesis that aphasic patients can be classified into different ability and response profile groups, and that patients utilize different cognitive resources in different comprehension tasks. These results are scientifically important and could not have been discovered by using the simple Rasch model. This article has supplementary material online.
AB - Aphasia is the loss of the ability to produce and/or comprehend language, due to injury to brain areas responsible for these functions. Aphasic patients' performance on comprehension tests has traditionally been related both to the patient's individual ability and to the difficulty of the test questions. The natural choice for analysis of these test results is the Rasch model. It assumes that the probability of a patient responding correctly to a question is the inverse-logit function of the difference between the individual patient's ability and the difficulty of the test question. This study first modeled the way aphasic patients process different sentence types, as well as their ability to accomplish tasks using Rasch models. However, several scientifically important features of the data, such as the correlation of correct responses between two different comprehension tasks, and the association between response patterns in control sentences and response patterns in experimental sentences, were found to be inadequately captured by such models. Alternatively, we used a full Bayesian approach, exploring a mixture of generalized linear mixed models that clustered patients into similar response patterns and abilities. The mixture model was found to better describe the experimental results than any other model examined. The mixture model also expresses the hypothesis that aphasic patients can be classified into different ability and response profile groups, and that patients utilize different cognitive resources in different comprehension tasks. These results are scientifically important and could not have been discovered by using the simple Rasch model. This article has supplementary material online.
KW - Bayesian analysis
KW - GLMM
KW - IRT
KW - Mixture models
KW - Similar tests
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862950987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862950987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10017
DO - 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10017
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84862950987
SN - 0162-1459
VL - 106
SP - 1304
EP - 1316
JO - Journal of the American Statistical Association
JF - Journal of the American Statistical Association
IS - 496
ER -