TY - JOUR
T1 - Rapid, sensitive detection of PFOA with smartphone-based flow rate analysis utilizing competitive molecular interactions during capillary action
AU - Breshears, Lane E.
AU - Mata-Robles, Samantha
AU - Tang, Yisha
AU - Baker, Jacob C.
AU - Reynolds, Kelly A.
AU - Yoon, Jeong Yeol
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/3/15
Y1 - 2023/3/15
N2 - Perfluorinated-alkyl substances (PFAS) pose an unmet threat to the public because they are not strictly monitored and regulated. Perfluorinated-carbon alkyl chains (PFOA), a type of PFAS, at 70 fg/μL is the current health and safety recommendation. Current testing methods for PFOA and PFAS chemicals include HPLC-MS/MS and molecularly imprinted polymers, which are expensive, time-consuming, and require training. In this work, PFOA and PFOS detection was performed on a paper microfluidic chip using competitive interactions between PFOA/PFOS, cellulose fibers, and various reagents (L-lysine, casein, and albumin). Such interactions altered the surface tension at the wetting front and, subsequently, the capillary flow rate. A smartphone captured the videos of this capillary action. The samples flowed through the channel in less than 2 min. Albumin worked the best in detecting PFOA, followed by casein. The detection limit was 10 ag/μL in DI water and 1 fg/μL in effluent (processed) wastewater. Specificity to other non-fluorocarbon surfactants was also tested, using anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), non-ionic Tween 20, and cationic cetrimonium bromide (CTAB). A combination of the reagents successfully distinguished PFOA from all three surfactants at 100% accuracy. This low-cost, handheld assay can be an accessible alternative for rapid in situ estimation of PFOA concentration.
AB - Perfluorinated-alkyl substances (PFAS) pose an unmet threat to the public because they are not strictly monitored and regulated. Perfluorinated-carbon alkyl chains (PFOA), a type of PFAS, at 70 fg/μL is the current health and safety recommendation. Current testing methods for PFOA and PFAS chemicals include HPLC-MS/MS and molecularly imprinted polymers, which are expensive, time-consuming, and require training. In this work, PFOA and PFOS detection was performed on a paper microfluidic chip using competitive interactions between PFOA/PFOS, cellulose fibers, and various reagents (L-lysine, casein, and albumin). Such interactions altered the surface tension at the wetting front and, subsequently, the capillary flow rate. A smartphone captured the videos of this capillary action. The samples flowed through the channel in less than 2 min. Albumin worked the best in detecting PFOA, followed by casein. The detection limit was 10 ag/μL in DI water and 1 fg/μL in effluent (processed) wastewater. Specificity to other non-fluorocarbon surfactants was also tested, using anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), non-ionic Tween 20, and cationic cetrimonium bromide (CTAB). A combination of the reagents successfully distinguished PFOA from all three surfactants at 100% accuracy. This low-cost, handheld assay can be an accessible alternative for rapid in situ estimation of PFOA concentration.
KW - Capillary flow dynamics
KW - Microfluidic paper-based analytic device
KW - PFOA
KW - Smartphone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146027589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146027589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130699
DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130699
M3 - Article
C2 - 36603430
AN - SCOPUS:85146027589
SN - 0304-3894
VL - 446
JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials
JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials
M1 - 130699
ER -