TY - GEN
T1 - Random Forest and K-Means Clustering Algorithms to Classify of 18F-Florbetapir Brain PET
AU - Bootherstone, Alexa
AU - Lee, Louis
AU - Cristant, Liam
AU - Kuo, Phillip H.
AU - Uribe, Carlos
AU - Black, Sandra E.
AU - Zukotynski, Katherine
AU - Gaudet, Vincent
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This paper explores and compares the use of two common machine learning (ML) algorithms, random forests (RF) and k-means clustering (KMC), for classifying 18F-florbetapir brain PET as positive or negative for amyloid deposition. The pilot dataset consists of 65 18F-Florbetapir PET and corresponding MRI studies taken from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Each PET scan was read as positive or negative for amyloid deposition by two physicians dual board certified in nuclear medicine and radiology with final interpretation based on consensus. This clinical interpretation of the PET scans served as the gold standard. Using an image processing pipeline, standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) were computed in 57 brain regions, with normalization to the cerebellar gray matter. The RF algorithm had a slightly higher classification accuracy (91±6%) compared with the KMC algorithm (81±3%), using 4-fold cross-validation. However, the KMC algorithm had lower computational cost and may highlight equivocal cases on clinical interpretation. Further investigation is ongoing.
AB - This paper explores and compares the use of two common machine learning (ML) algorithms, random forests (RF) and k-means clustering (KMC), for classifying 18F-florbetapir brain PET as positive or negative for amyloid deposition. The pilot dataset consists of 65 18F-Florbetapir PET and corresponding MRI studies taken from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Each PET scan was read as positive or negative for amyloid deposition by two physicians dual board certified in nuclear medicine and radiology with final interpretation based on consensus. This clinical interpretation of the PET scans served as the gold standard. Using an image processing pipeline, standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) were computed in 57 brain regions, with normalization to the cerebellar gray matter. The RF algorithm had a slightly higher classification accuracy (91±6%) compared with the KMC algorithm (81±3%), using 4-fold cross-validation. However, the KMC algorithm had lower computational cost and may highlight equivocal cases on clinical interpretation. Further investigation is ongoing.
KW - K-means clustering
KW - amyloid
KW - dementia
KW - machine learning
KW - mild cognitive impairment
KW - positron emission tomography
KW - random forest
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203143771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85203143771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ISMVL60454.2024.00040
DO - 10.1109/ISMVL60454.2024.00040
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85203143771
T3 - Proceedings of The International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic
SP - 167
EP - 171
BT - Proceedings - 2024 IEEE 54th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, ISMVL 2024
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 54th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, ISMVL 2024
Y2 - 28 May 2024 through 30 May 2024
ER -