Quantifying structural racism in cohort studies to advance prospective evidence

Shawna Follis, Khadijah Breathett, Lorena Garcia, Monik Jimenez, Crystal W. Cené, Eric Whitsel, Haley Hedlin, Electra D. Paskett, Shiqi Zhang, Cynthia A. Thomson, Marcia L. Stefanick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Calls-to-action in health research have described a need to improve research on race, ethnicity, and structural racism. Well-established cohort studies typically lack access to novel structural and social determinants of health (SSDOH) or precise race and ethnicity categorization, contributing to a loss of rigor to conduct informative analyses and a gap in prospective evidence on the role of structural racism in health outcomes. We propose and implement methods that prospective cohort studies can use to begin to rectify this, using the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) cohort as a case study. To do so, we evaluated the quality, precision, and representativeness of race, ethnicity, and SSDOH data compared with the target US population and operationalized methods to quantify structural determinants in cohort studies. Harmonizing racial and ethnic categorization to the current standards set by the Office of Management and Budget improved measurement precision, aligned with published recommendations, disaggregated groups, decreased missing data, and decreased participants reporting “some other race”. Disaggregation revealed sub-group disparities in SSDOH, including a greater proportion of Black-Latina (35.2%) and AIAN-Latina (33.3%) WHI participants with income below the US median compared with White-Latina (42.5%) participants. We found similarities in the racial and ethnic patterning of SSDOH disparities between WHI and US women but less disparity overall in WHI. Despite higher individual-level advantage in WHI, racial disparities in neighborhood resources were similar to the US, reflecting structural racism. Median neighborhood income was comparable between Black WHI ($39,000) and US ($34,700) women. WHI SSDOH-associated outcomes may be generalizable on the basis of comparing across race and ethnicity but may quantitatively (but not qualitatively) underestimate US effect sizes. This paper takes steps towards data justice by implementing methods to make visible hidden health disparity groups and operationalizing structural-level determinants in prospective cohort studies, a first step to establishing causality in health disparities research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101417
JournalSSM - Population Health
Volume22
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Cohort study
  • Disparities
  • Ethnicity
  • Health
  • Office of management and budget
  • Race
  • Social determinants of health
  • Social epidemiology
  • Structural racism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying structural racism in cohort studies to advance prospective evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this