TY - GEN
T1 - Proportional contact representations of 4-connected planar graphs
AU - Alam, Md Jawaherul
AU - Kobourov, Stephen G.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In a contact representation of a planar graph, vertices are represented by interior-disjoint polygons and two polygons share a non-empty common boundary when the corresponding vertices are adjacent. In the weighted version, a weight is assigned to each vertex and a contact representation is called proportional if each polygon realizes an area proportional to the vertex weight. In this paper we study proportional contact representations of 4-connected internally triangulated planar graphs. The best known lower and upper bounds on the polygonal complexity for such graphs are 4 and 8, respectively. We narrow the gap between them by proving the existence of a representation with complexity 6. We then disprove a 10-year old conjecture on the existence of a Hamiltonian canonical cycle in a 4-connected maximal planar graph, which also implies that a previously suggested method for constructing proportional contact representations of complexity 6 for these graphs will not work. Finally we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether a 4-connected planar graph admits a proportional contact representation using only rectangles.
AB - In a contact representation of a planar graph, vertices are represented by interior-disjoint polygons and two polygons share a non-empty common boundary when the corresponding vertices are adjacent. In the weighted version, a weight is assigned to each vertex and a contact representation is called proportional if each polygon realizes an area proportional to the vertex weight. In this paper we study proportional contact representations of 4-connected internally triangulated planar graphs. The best known lower and upper bounds on the polygonal complexity for such graphs are 4 and 8, respectively. We narrow the gap between them by proving the existence of a representation with complexity 6. We then disprove a 10-year old conjecture on the existence of a Hamiltonian canonical cycle in a 4-connected maximal planar graph, which also implies that a previously suggested method for constructing proportional contact representations of complexity 6 for these graphs will not work. Finally we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether a 4-connected planar graph admits a proportional contact representation using only rectangles.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874180409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874180409&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-36763-2_19
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-36763-2_19
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84874180409
SN - 9783642367625
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 211
EP - 223
BT - Graph Drawing - 20th International Symposium, GD 2012, Revised Selected Papers
T2 - 20th International Symposium on Graph Drawing, GD 2012
Y2 - 19 September 2012 through 21 September 2012
ER -