TY - JOUR
T1 - Prophylactic antibiotic compliance with published guidelines
AU - Erstad, Brian L.
AU - Schultz, Jill M.
PY - 2006/1
Y1 - 2006/1
N2 - Purpose: To examine the rate of compliance with National Surgical Infection Prevention Project performance measures and compliance with American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines for procedures not covered by these measures and to evaluate noncompliance for explanatory factors. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics for Class I (clean) or Class II (clean-contaminated) surgical procedures. Information collected included antibiotic ordered, antibiotic given, dose of antibiotic, time of administration, time of incision, time of closure, duration of procedure, need for re-dosing during the procedure, documentation of re-dosing administered, and antibiotic discontinuation. Results: Choice of antibiotic for prophylaxis was appropriate in 99% of the 568 procedures. Antibiotic was administered too early in 94 of 527 (17.8%) patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were inappropriately continued for more than 24 hours in 43 of 216 (20%) patients undergoing noncardiothoracic procedures and for more than 48 hours in 4 of 10 (40%) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Conclusion: Although improvements in key performance measures related to prophylactic antibiotic agent selection, timing of administration, and discontinuation have been made compared to data collected in a larger multicenter study conducted at the beginning of this century, there remains considerable room for improvement.
AB - Purpose: To examine the rate of compliance with National Surgical Infection Prevention Project performance measures and compliance with American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines for procedures not covered by these measures and to evaluate noncompliance for explanatory factors. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics for Class I (clean) or Class II (clean-contaminated) surgical procedures. Information collected included antibiotic ordered, antibiotic given, dose of antibiotic, time of administration, time of incision, time of closure, duration of procedure, need for re-dosing during the procedure, documentation of re-dosing administered, and antibiotic discontinuation. Results: Choice of antibiotic for prophylaxis was appropriate in 99% of the 568 procedures. Antibiotic was administered too early in 94 of 527 (17.8%) patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were inappropriately continued for more than 24 hours in 43 of 216 (20%) patients undergoing noncardiothoracic procedures and for more than 48 hours in 4 of 10 (40%) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Conclusion: Although improvements in key performance measures related to prophylactic antibiotic agent selection, timing of administration, and discontinuation have been made compared to data collected in a larger multicenter study conducted at the beginning of this century, there remains considerable room for improvement.
KW - Antibacterial agents
KW - Antibiotic prophylaxis
KW - Surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248217956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248217956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0897190007300459
DO - 10.1177/0897190007300459
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:34248217956
SN - 0897-1900
VL - 19
SP - 301
EP - 305
JO - Journal of Pharmacy Practice
JF - Journal of Pharmacy Practice
IS - 5
ER -