Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial

  • Kathy S. Albain
  • , William E. Barlow
  • , Steven Shak
  • , Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
  • , Robert B. Livingston
  • , I. Tien Yeh
  • , Peter Ravdin
  • , Roberto Bugarini
  • , Frederick L. Baehner
  • , Nancy E. Davidson
  • , George W. Sledge
  • , Eric P. Winer
  • , Clifford Hudis
  • , James N. Ingle
  • , Edith A. Perez
  • , Kathleen I. Pritchard
  • , Lois Shepherd
  • , Julie R. Gralow
  • , Carl Yoshizawa
  • , D. Craig Allred
  • C. Kent Osborne, Daniel F. Hayes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1254 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The 21-gene recurrence score assay is prognostic for women with node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. A low recurrence score predicts little benefit of chemotherapy. For node-positive breast cancer, we investigated whether the recurrence score was prognostic in women treated with tamoxifen alone and whether it identified those who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite higher risks of recurrence. Methods: The phase 3 trial SWOG-8814 for postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer showed that chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) before tamoxifen (CAF-T) added survival benefit to treatment with tamoxifen alone. Optional tumour banking yielded specimens for determination of recurrence score by RT-PCR. In this retrospective analysis, we assessed the effect of recurrence score on disease-free survival by treatment group (tamoxifen vs CAF-T) using Cox regression, adjusting for number of positive nodes. Findings: There were 367 specimens (40% of the 927 patients in the tamoxifen and CAF-T groups) with sufficient RNA for analysis (tamoxifen, n=148; CAF-T, n=219). The recurrence score was prognostic in the tamoxifen-alone group (p=0·006; hazard ratio [HR] 2·64, 95% CI 1·33-5·27, for a 50-point difference in recurrence score). There was no benefit of CAF in patients with a low recurrence score (score <18; log-rank p=0·97; HR 1·02, 0·54-1·93), but an improvement in disease-free survival for those with a high recurrence score (score ≥31; log-rank p=0·033; HR 0·59, 0·35-1·01), after adjustment for number of positive nodes. The recurrence score by treatment interaction was significant in the first 5 years (p=0·029), with no additional prediction beyond 5 years (p=0·58), although the cumulative benefit remained at 10 years. Results were similar for overall survival and breast-cancer-specific survival. Interpretation: The recurrence score is prognostic for tamoxifen-treated patients with positive nodes and predicts significant benefit of CAF in tumours with a high recurrence score. A low recurrence score identifies women who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite positive nodes. Funding: National Cancer Institute and Genomic Health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-65
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet Oncology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this