TY - JOUR
T1 - Profiles of quality of life among US young adult cancer survivors and their associations with potential psychosocial intervention targets of hope and psychological flexibility
AU - Berg, Carla J.
AU - Schubel, Laura C.
AU - McCready, Darcey M.
AU - Shajan, Sheena
AU - Bhanot, Palash
AU - Dopke, Campbell
AU - Howlader, Afrah
AU - Hinds, Pamela S.
AU - Levine, Jennifer
AU - Lyon, Maureen E.
AU - Chalasani, Pavani
AU - Arem, Hannah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Purpose: Given the growing population of young adult (YA) cancer survivors, understanding their different quality of life (QOL) profiles is important for informing interventions to promote QOL, which may target constructs like hope or psychological flexibility. This study assessed YA survivors’ QOL profiles and their associations with these 2 constructs. Methods: Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted on PROMIS QOL measures (physical functioning, social functioning, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, anxiety, depression) among 155 YA survivors (ages 18–39; Mage = 32.89, 87.7% female, 8.4% Hispanic, 22.6% racial minority) within 3 years post-treatment. Multivariable regressions assessed sociodemographic and cancer-related factors in relation to class (multinomial logistic), and class in relation to scores on Snyder’s Hope Scale and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II assessing psychological inflexibility (linear). Results: LCA identified 4 classes: (1) low physical/social functioning with high symptoms (i.e., fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, anxiety, depression; 43.2%); (2) high physical/social functioning with high symptoms (23.9%); (3) high physical/social functioning with low symptoms (17.4%); and (4) low physical functioning, moderate social functioning and physical symptoms, and low mental health symptoms (15.5%). Compared to class 3 (referent), classes 1 and 4 more likely had chemotherapy (aOR = 6.54, CI 1.22–34.48; aOR = 12.82, CI 1.05–28.67), and class 2 had higher monthly income (≥ vs. < $4,200: aOR = 1.16, CI 1.02–1.54). Additionally, classes 1 and 2 had lower hope (B = −10.95, CI −14.42, −7.48; B = -5.50, CI −9.28, −1.71) and higher psychological inflexibility (B = 12.41, CI 9.06, 15.76; B = 8.21, CI 4.57, 11.86). Conclusions: YA survivors demonstrated varied QOL profiles, often with considerable symptoms. Interventions targeting hope and/or psychological flexibility may promote QOL.
AB - Purpose: Given the growing population of young adult (YA) cancer survivors, understanding their different quality of life (QOL) profiles is important for informing interventions to promote QOL, which may target constructs like hope or psychological flexibility. This study assessed YA survivors’ QOL profiles and their associations with these 2 constructs. Methods: Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted on PROMIS QOL measures (physical functioning, social functioning, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, anxiety, depression) among 155 YA survivors (ages 18–39; Mage = 32.89, 87.7% female, 8.4% Hispanic, 22.6% racial minority) within 3 years post-treatment. Multivariable regressions assessed sociodemographic and cancer-related factors in relation to class (multinomial logistic), and class in relation to scores on Snyder’s Hope Scale and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II assessing psychological inflexibility (linear). Results: LCA identified 4 classes: (1) low physical/social functioning with high symptoms (i.e., fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, anxiety, depression; 43.2%); (2) high physical/social functioning with high symptoms (23.9%); (3) high physical/social functioning with low symptoms (17.4%); and (4) low physical functioning, moderate social functioning and physical symptoms, and low mental health symptoms (15.5%). Compared to class 3 (referent), classes 1 and 4 more likely had chemotherapy (aOR = 6.54, CI 1.22–34.48; aOR = 12.82, CI 1.05–28.67), and class 2 had higher monthly income (≥ vs. < $4,200: aOR = 1.16, CI 1.02–1.54). Additionally, classes 1 and 2 had lower hope (B = −10.95, CI −14.42, −7.48; B = -5.50, CI −9.28, −1.71) and higher psychological inflexibility (B = 12.41, CI 9.06, 15.76; B = 8.21, CI 4.57, 11.86). Conclusions: YA survivors demonstrated varied QOL profiles, often with considerable symptoms. Interventions targeting hope and/or psychological flexibility may promote QOL.
KW - Acceptance and commitment therapy
KW - Cancer survivorship
KW - Health promotion
KW - Hope
KW - Positive psychology
KW - Quality of life
KW - Young adult cancer survivors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009236413
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009236413#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s11136-025-04010-0
DO - 10.1007/s11136-025-04010-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 40580382
AN - SCOPUS:105009236413
SN - 0962-9343
VL - 34
SP - 2677
EP - 2688
JO - Quality of Life Research
JF - Quality of Life Research
IS - 9
ER -