Profiles of quality of life among US young adult cancer survivors and their associations with potential psychosocial intervention targets of hope and psychological flexibility

  • Carla J. Berg
  • , Laura C. Schubel
  • , Darcey M. McCready
  • , Sheena Shajan
  • , Palash Bhanot
  • , Campbell Dopke
  • , Afrah Howlader
  • , Pamela S. Hinds
  • , Jennifer Levine
  • , Maureen E. Lyon
  • , Pavani Chalasani
  • , Hannah Arem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Given the growing population of young adult (YA) cancer survivors, understanding their different quality of life (QOL) profiles is important for informing interventions to promote QOL, which may target constructs like hope or psychological flexibility. This study assessed YA survivors’ QOL profiles and their associations with these 2 constructs. Methods: Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted on PROMIS QOL measures (physical functioning, social functioning, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, anxiety, depression) among 155 YA survivors (ages 18–39; Mage = 32.89, 87.7% female, 8.4% Hispanic, 22.6% racial minority) within 3 years post-treatment. Multivariable regressions assessed sociodemographic and cancer-related factors in relation to class (multinomial logistic), and class in relation to scores on Snyder’s Hope Scale and the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II assessing psychological inflexibility (linear). Results: LCA identified 4 classes: (1) low physical/social functioning with high symptoms (i.e., fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, anxiety, depression; 43.2%); (2) high physical/social functioning with high symptoms (23.9%); (3) high physical/social functioning with low symptoms (17.4%); and (4) low physical functioning, moderate social functioning and physical symptoms, and low mental health symptoms (15.5%). Compared to class 3 (referent), classes 1 and 4 more likely had chemotherapy (aOR = 6.54, CI 1.22–34.48; aOR = 12.82, CI 1.05–28.67), and class 2 had higher monthly income (≥ vs. < $4,200: aOR = 1.16, CI 1.02–1.54). Additionally, classes 1 and 2 had lower hope (B = −10.95, CI −14.42, −7.48; B = -5.50, CI −9.28, −1.71) and higher psychological inflexibility (B = 12.41, CI 9.06, 15.76; B = 8.21, CI 4.57, 11.86). Conclusions: YA survivors demonstrated varied QOL profiles, often with considerable symptoms. Interventions targeting hope and/or psychological flexibility may promote QOL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2677-2688
Number of pages12
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume34
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy
  • Cancer survivorship
  • Health promotion
  • Hope
  • Positive psychology
  • Quality of life
  • Young adult cancer survivors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Profiles of quality of life among US young adult cancer survivors and their associations with potential psychosocial intervention targets of hope and psychological flexibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this