TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines
AU - Nodora, Jesse N.
AU - Martz, William D.
AU - Ashbeck, Erin L.
AU - Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
AU - Thompson, Patricia A.
AU - Martínez, María Elena
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We thank Amit Algotar and Fang Wang for their valuable contributions. Work was supported by the Richard H. Hollen Professorship from the American Cancer Society and Public Health Service grants CA-41108 and CA-23074 and Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) CA 023074 from the National Cancer Institute.
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Objective: To assess self-reported compliance to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines among primary care physicians (PCPs) and to assess physician and practice characteristics associated with reported compliance. Methods: Survey data from 984 PCPs in Arizona were used. Self-reported CRC screening practices, recommendations, and compliance with guidelines were assessed. Physician and practice characteristics associated with guideline compliance were also evaluated. Results: While 77.5% of physicians reported using national screening guidelines, only 51.7% reported recommendations consistent with the guidelines. Younger physicians were significantly more likely to report compliance with screening guidelines (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.07-2.10) as were female clinicians (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.11-1.92). Physicians practicing in solo (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.19-0.58), group (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.21-0.62), or community health centers (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.81) were significantly less likely to report following guidelines as compared to those in academic practice. Guideline compliance was higher for fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (65.0%) than colonoscopy (56.7%); overuse of screening for these modalities was reported among 34.4% of physicians. Conclusions: PCPs are not adequately following CRC screening guidelines. Further studies are needed to clarify the reasons for this lack of compliance, especially as guidelines become more complex.
AB - Objective: To assess self-reported compliance to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines among primary care physicians (PCPs) and to assess physician and practice characteristics associated with reported compliance. Methods: Survey data from 984 PCPs in Arizona were used. Self-reported CRC screening practices, recommendations, and compliance with guidelines were assessed. Physician and practice characteristics associated with guideline compliance were also evaluated. Results: While 77.5% of physicians reported using national screening guidelines, only 51.7% reported recommendations consistent with the guidelines. Younger physicians were significantly more likely to report compliance with screening guidelines (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.07-2.10) as were female clinicians (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.11-1.92). Physicians practicing in solo (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.19-0.58), group (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.21-0.62), or community health centers (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.81) were significantly less likely to report following guidelines as compared to those in academic practice. Guideline compliance was higher for fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (65.0%) than colonoscopy (56.7%); overuse of screening for these modalities was reported among 34.4% of physicians. Conclusions: PCPs are not adequately following CRC screening guidelines. Further studies are needed to clarify the reasons for this lack of compliance, especially as guidelines become more complex.
KW - Colonoscopy
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Compliance
KW - Fecal occult blood test
KW - Guidelines
KW - Primary care physicians
KW - Screening
KW - Sigmoidoscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052324054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052324054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10552-011-9801-0
DO - 10.1007/s10552-011-9801-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 21710193
AN - SCOPUS:80052324054
SN - 0957-5243
VL - 22
SP - 1277
EP - 1287
JO - Cancer Causes and Control
JF - Cancer Causes and Control
IS - 9
ER -