TY - JOUR
T1 - Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables
AU - Brucks, Merrie
AU - Zeithaml, Valarie A.
AU - Naylor, Gillian
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to the Marketing Science Institute and the Business Foundation of North Carolina through the University of North Carolina for the financial support and cooperation provided for this research. The authors also thank Jim Bettman, Julie Edell, and John Lynch for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article, as well as Michael Guiry and Drue Schuler for their help in data collection. This article has also benefited from the constructive comments of Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science reviewers.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Delivering quality products requires an understanding of the critical dimensions and cues that consumers use to judge quality. To that end, this article addresses two fundamental research issues. Using a qualitative study, the authors first develop a generalizable typology of quality dimensions for durable goods that includes ease of use, versatility, durability, serviceability, performance, and prestige. Second, the authors conduct a process-tracing laboratory experiment to examine hawkey marketing variables - price, brand name, and product attributes - affect consumers' judgment processes and inferences about how products perform on the six quality dimensions. Results of the experiment indicate that consumers use price and brand name differently to judge the quality dimensions, searching for price and brand name much more frequently when evaluating prestige than when evaluating any other quality dimension. Results suggest that managers must determine the relevant quality dimensions for a product category and the cues that are salient for judging those dimensions.
AB - Delivering quality products requires an understanding of the critical dimensions and cues that consumers use to judge quality. To that end, this article addresses two fundamental research issues. Using a qualitative study, the authors first develop a generalizable typology of quality dimensions for durable goods that includes ease of use, versatility, durability, serviceability, performance, and prestige. Second, the authors conduct a process-tracing laboratory experiment to examine hawkey marketing variables - price, brand name, and product attributes - affect consumers' judgment processes and inferences about how products perform on the six quality dimensions. Results of the experiment indicate that consumers use price and brand name differently to judge the quality dimensions, searching for price and brand name much more frequently when evaluating prestige than when evaluating any other quality dimension. Results suggest that managers must determine the relevant quality dimensions for a product category and the cues that are salient for judging those dimensions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23044520129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23044520129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0092070300283005
DO - 10.1177/0092070300283005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:23044520129
SN - 0092-0703
VL - 28
SP - 359
EP - 374
JO - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
JF - Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
IS - 3
ER -