TY - JOUR
T1 - Pretransplantation Portal Vein Recanalization and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation for Chronic Portal Vein Thrombosis
T2 - Final Analysis of a 61-Patient Cohort
AU - Thornburg, Bartley
AU - Desai, Kush
AU - Hickey, Ryan
AU - Hohlastos, Elias
AU - Kulik, Laura
AU - Ganger, Daniel
AU - Baker, Talia
AU - Abecassis, Michael
AU - Caicedo, Juan C.
AU - Ladner, Daniela
AU - Fryer, Jonathan
AU - Riaz, Ahsun
AU - Lewandowski, Robert J.
AU - Salem, Riad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 SIR
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Purpose To report the final analysis of the safety and efficacy of portal vein (PV) recanalization (PVR) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation (PVR-TIPS) in patients with PV thrombosis (PVT) in need of liver transplantation. Materials and Methods Sixty-one patients with cirrhosis and PVT underwent PVR-TIPS to improve transplantation candidacy. Median patient age was 58 years (range, 22–75 y), and median pre-TIPS Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 14 (range, 7–42). The most common etiologies of cirrhosis were nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in 18 patients (30%) and hepatitis C in 13 patients (21%). Twenty-seven patients (44%) had partial PVT, and 34 patients (56%) had complete thrombosis. Forty-nine patients (80%) had Yerdel grade 2 PVT, and 12 (20%) had Yerdel grade 3 PVT. Twenty-nine patients (48%) had cavernous transformation of the PV. Results PVR-TIPS was technically successful in 60 of 61 patients (98%). PV/TIPS patency was maintained in 55 patients (92%) at a median follow-up of 19.2 months (range, 0–105.9 mo). Recurrent PV/TIPS thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (8%), all of whom initially presented with complete PVT. The most common adverse events were TIPS stenosis in 13 patients (22%) and transient encephalopathy in 11 patients (18%). Twenty-four patients (39%) underwent transplantation, 23 of whom (96%) received an end-to-end anastomosis. There were no cases of recurrent PVT following transplantation, with a median imaging follow-up of 32.5 months (range, 0.4–75.4 mo). Five-year overall survival rate was 82%. Conclusions PVR-TIPS is a safe, effective, and durable treatment option for patients with chronic PVT who need liver transplantation.
AB - Purpose To report the final analysis of the safety and efficacy of portal vein (PV) recanalization (PVR) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation (PVR-TIPS) in patients with PV thrombosis (PVT) in need of liver transplantation. Materials and Methods Sixty-one patients with cirrhosis and PVT underwent PVR-TIPS to improve transplantation candidacy. Median patient age was 58 years (range, 22–75 y), and median pre-TIPS Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 14 (range, 7–42). The most common etiologies of cirrhosis were nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in 18 patients (30%) and hepatitis C in 13 patients (21%). Twenty-seven patients (44%) had partial PVT, and 34 patients (56%) had complete thrombosis. Forty-nine patients (80%) had Yerdel grade 2 PVT, and 12 (20%) had Yerdel grade 3 PVT. Twenty-nine patients (48%) had cavernous transformation of the PV. Results PVR-TIPS was technically successful in 60 of 61 patients (98%). PV/TIPS patency was maintained in 55 patients (92%) at a median follow-up of 19.2 months (range, 0–105.9 mo). Recurrent PV/TIPS thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (8%), all of whom initially presented with complete PVT. The most common adverse events were TIPS stenosis in 13 patients (22%) and transient encephalopathy in 11 patients (18%). Twenty-four patients (39%) underwent transplantation, 23 of whom (96%) received an end-to-end anastomosis. There were no cases of recurrent PVT following transplantation, with a median imaging follow-up of 32.5 months (range, 0.4–75.4 mo). Five-year overall survival rate was 82%. Conclusions PVR-TIPS is a safe, effective, and durable treatment option for patients with chronic PVT who need liver transplantation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031672553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031672553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.08.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.08.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 29050854
AN - SCOPUS:85031672553
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 28
SP - 1714-1721.e2
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 12
ER -