TY - JOUR
T1 - Teacher preparation for emergent bilingual students
T2 - Implications of evidence for policy
AU - López, Francesca
AU - Santibañez, Lucrecia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Arizona State University. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/3/12
Y1 - 2018/3/12
N2 - Failure to adequately prepare teachers of emergent bilingual (EB) students could have devastating consequences for student achievement, EB reclassification, and eventually, high school and college completion. To enhance the policy discourse, we explore how teacher certification requirements relate to both EB student achievement and teacher self-efficacy in three states with similar EB student populations but disparate policies on ways to meet EBs’ needs: Arizona, California, and Texas. To do this we ask: (1) How well do states prepare their teachers to meet the needs of EBs? (2) What knowledge specific to meeting EBs’ needs do states require their teachers to demonstrate? (3) How are these requirements related to teacher perceptions of their preparedness to effectively teach EBs? We find that there are marked differences across the three states in terms of how well they prepare EBs, and these patterns can be discerned from their teacher preparation requirements. Although teachers’ self-efficacy does not appear to be related to teacher training in the first three years of teaching, there is an advantage to more rigorous training over time. Implications for policy are discussed.
AB - Failure to adequately prepare teachers of emergent bilingual (EB) students could have devastating consequences for student achievement, EB reclassification, and eventually, high school and college completion. To enhance the policy discourse, we explore how teacher certification requirements relate to both EB student achievement and teacher self-efficacy in three states with similar EB student populations but disparate policies on ways to meet EBs’ needs: Arizona, California, and Texas. To do this we ask: (1) How well do states prepare their teachers to meet the needs of EBs? (2) What knowledge specific to meeting EBs’ needs do states require their teachers to demonstrate? (3) How are these requirements related to teacher perceptions of their preparedness to effectively teach EBs? We find that there are marked differences across the three states in terms of how well they prepare EBs, and these patterns can be discerned from their teacher preparation requirements. Although teachers’ self-efficacy does not appear to be related to teacher training in the first three years of teaching, there is an advantage to more rigorous training over time. Implications for policy are discussed.
KW - English language learners
KW - Teacher effectiveness
KW - Teacher preparation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044110598
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044110598#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.14507/epaa.26.2866
DO - 10.14507/epaa.26.2866
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044110598
SN - 1068-2341
VL - 26
JO - Education Policy Analysis Archives
JF - Education Policy Analysis Archives
ER -