TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of enhanced response with benralizumab for patients with severe asthma
T2 - pooled analysis of the SIROCCO and CALIMA studies
AU - FitzGerald, J. Mark
AU - Bleecker, Eugene R.
AU - Menzies-Gow, Andrew
AU - Zangrilli, James G.
AU - Hirsch, Ian
AU - Metcalfe, Paul
AU - Newbold, Paul
AU - Goldman, Mitchell
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this study was provided by AstraZeneca. We thank Yanping Wu (AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) for her statistical analysis support. Writing and editing support, including preparation of the draft manuscript under the direction and guidance of the authors, incorporating author feedback, and manuscript submission, was provided by Alan Saltzman, of Endpoint Medical Communications (Conshohocken, PA, USA), and Michael A Nissen, of AstraZeneca (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). This support was funded by AstraZeneca.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Background Benralizumab is an anti-eosinophilic, anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody that has been shown to significantly reduce asthma exacerbations and improve lung function for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. We further explored the efficacy of benralizumab for patients with different baseline blood eosinophil thresholds and exacerbation histories. Methods This study is a pooled analysis of the results from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) phase 3 studies. In these studies, patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg, either every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (with first three doses given every 4 weeks), or placebo every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was annual exacerbation rate (AER) ratio versus placebo, analysed by baseline eosinophil counts (≥0, ≥150, ≥300, or ≥450 cells per μL) and by number of exacerbations (two vs three or more) during the year before enrolment. The analyses were done in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. Findings Of 2295 patients, 756 received benralizumab every 4 weeks, 762 received benralizumab every 8 weeks, and 777 patients received placebo. AER among patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of at least 0 cells per μL was 1·16 (95% CI 1·05–1·28) in patients who received placebo versus 0·75 (0·66–0·84) in patients who received benralizumab every 8 weeks (rate ratio 0·64, 0·55–0·75; p<0·0001). In patients who received benralizumab every 4 weeks who had eosinophil counts of 0 or more cells per μL, AER was 0·73 (0·65–0·82); rate ratio versus placebo was 0·63 (0·54–0·74; p<0·0001). The extent to which exacerbation rates were reduced increased with increasing blood eosinophil thresholds and with greater exacerbation history in patients in the 4-weekly and 8-weekly benralizumab groups. Greater improvements in AER were seen with benralizumab compared with placebo for patients with a combination of high blood eosinophil thresholds and a history of more frequent exacerbations. Interpretation These results will help to guide clinicians when they are deciding whether to use benralizumab to treat patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma. Funding AstraZeneca.
AB - Background Benralizumab is an anti-eosinophilic, anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody that has been shown to significantly reduce asthma exacerbations and improve lung function for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. We further explored the efficacy of benralizumab for patients with different baseline blood eosinophil thresholds and exacerbation histories. Methods This study is a pooled analysis of the results from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled SIROCCO (NCT01928771) and CALIMA (NCT01914757) phase 3 studies. In these studies, patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg, either every 4 weeks or every 8 weeks (with first three doses given every 4 weeks), or placebo every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was annual exacerbation rate (AER) ratio versus placebo, analysed by baseline eosinophil counts (≥0, ≥150, ≥300, or ≥450 cells per μL) and by number of exacerbations (two vs three or more) during the year before enrolment. The analyses were done in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. Findings Of 2295 patients, 756 received benralizumab every 4 weeks, 762 received benralizumab every 8 weeks, and 777 patients received placebo. AER among patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of at least 0 cells per μL was 1·16 (95% CI 1·05–1·28) in patients who received placebo versus 0·75 (0·66–0·84) in patients who received benralizumab every 8 weeks (rate ratio 0·64, 0·55–0·75; p<0·0001). In patients who received benralizumab every 4 weeks who had eosinophil counts of 0 or more cells per μL, AER was 0·73 (0·65–0·82); rate ratio versus placebo was 0·63 (0·54–0·74; p<0·0001). The extent to which exacerbation rates were reduced increased with increasing blood eosinophil thresholds and with greater exacerbation history in patients in the 4-weekly and 8-weekly benralizumab groups. Greater improvements in AER were seen with benralizumab compared with placebo for patients with a combination of high blood eosinophil thresholds and a history of more frequent exacerbations. Interpretation These results will help to guide clinicians when they are deciding whether to use benralizumab to treat patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma. Funding AstraZeneca.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028971515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028971515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30344-2
DO - 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30344-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 28919200
AN - SCOPUS:85028971515
SN - 2213-2600
VL - 6
SP - 51
EP - 64
JO - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
JF - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
IS - 1
ER -