TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Carcass Composition in Early-Weaned Simmental Steers Using a Combination of Real-time Ultrasound, Live Evaluation, Carcass Expected Progeny Differences, and GeneSTAR Marbling Marker
AU - Rincker, C. B.
AU - Pyatt, N. A.
AU - Berger, L. L.
AU - Faulkner, Dan B
AU - Walker, P. M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2006 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists.
PY - 2006/4/1
Y1 - 2006/4/1
N2 - Early-weaned Simmental steers (n = 192) were individually fed over 4 yr (48 head/ yr) to determine if real-time ultrasound (RTU), live evaluation, carcass expected progeny differences, GeneSTAR marbling, or a combination could accurately predict marbling composition. Steers were fed a high-concentrate diet for 249.7 ± 0.7 d and harvested at 423.3 ± 1.4 d of age. The RTU scans were recorded for ribeye area, intramuscular fat (IMF), and back fat thickness at 60-d intervals with final ultrasound scans taken ≤ 13 d prior to harvest. Yearling BW, marbling (MARB), percentage of retail cuts, and carcass weight expected progeny differences were calcu-lated for each steer. Visual estimations of quality and yield grade were made ≤ 7 d prior to pre-harvest by 3 evaluators. Average price data over 5 yr were used for dressed beef, grid premiums, and discounts. GeneSTAR did not affect (P > 0.10) IMF deposition. Genetic, live, and carcass parameters were regressed on chemical IMF, dressed price, and profit using stepwise regression analysis. For chemically determined IMF, 67.0% of the variation was explained by RTU quality grade (R2 = 0.585), percentage of retail cuts (R2 = 0.030), and MARB (R2 = 0.028), indicating that RTU was the only major contributor. Approximately 17% of the variation in average dressed price was explained by RTU. GeneSTAR MARB marker was not an accurate indicator of intramuscular deposition of early-weaned Simmental steers; however, MARB expected progeny difference (EPD) was correlated to IMF deposition. Live evaluation better estimated yield grade than quality grade. Real-time ultrasound most accurately predicted MARB, carcass value, and profit.
AB - Early-weaned Simmental steers (n = 192) were individually fed over 4 yr (48 head/ yr) to determine if real-time ultrasound (RTU), live evaluation, carcass expected progeny differences, GeneSTAR marbling, or a combination could accurately predict marbling composition. Steers were fed a high-concentrate diet for 249.7 ± 0.7 d and harvested at 423.3 ± 1.4 d of age. The RTU scans were recorded for ribeye area, intramuscular fat (IMF), and back fat thickness at 60-d intervals with final ultrasound scans taken ≤ 13 d prior to harvest. Yearling BW, marbling (MARB), percentage of retail cuts, and carcass weight expected progeny differences were calcu-lated for each steer. Visual estimations of quality and yield grade were made ≤ 7 d prior to pre-harvest by 3 evaluators. Average price data over 5 yr were used for dressed beef, grid premiums, and discounts. GeneSTAR did not affect (P > 0.10) IMF deposition. Genetic, live, and carcass parameters were regressed on chemical IMF, dressed price, and profit using stepwise regression analysis. For chemically determined IMF, 67.0% of the variation was explained by RTU quality grade (R2 = 0.585), percentage of retail cuts (R2 = 0.030), and MARB (R2 = 0.028), indicating that RTU was the only major contributor. Approximately 17% of the variation in average dressed price was explained by RTU. GeneSTAR MARB marker was not an accurate indicator of intramuscular deposition of early-weaned Simmental steers; however, MARB expected progeny difference (EPD) was correlated to IMF deposition. Live evaluation better estimated yield grade than quality grade. Real-time ultrasound most accurately predicted MARB, carcass value, and profit.
KW - DNA marker
KW - Expected progeny differences
KW - Live evaluation
KW - Predicting marbling deposition
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959308037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959308037&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31079-2
DO - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31079-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84959308037
SN - 1080-7446
VL - 22
SP - 144
EP - 152
JO - Professional Animal Scientist
JF - Professional Animal Scientist
IS - 2
ER -