TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Affective Responses to Unexpected Outcomes
AU - Coughlan, Richard
AU - Connolly, Terry
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by a dissertation grant from the University of Arizona and a research grant from the University of Richmond, both awarded to the first author. The authors thank Lee Beach and Lisa Ordonez for comments on earlier versions of the article. We also thank Daniel Ilgen and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful input throughout the process. A version of this article was presented at the 1999 meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Los Angeles, CA.
PY - 2001/7
Y1 - 2001/7
N2 - In decisions under uncertainty, decision makers confront two uncertainties: the uncertain linkage between actions and outcomes and the uncertain linkage between these outcomes and his or her affective responses to them. The two studies reported here examine affective responses to expected and unexpected outcomes in various settings. In Study 1, a scenario-based laboratory experiment (N = 149), we examined subjects' predicted responses to a range of outcomes, as a function of how surprising the outcome was. Study 2, a field study (N = 127), involved the expectations of bowlers about their scores in an upcoming game and about their responses to various outcomes at, above, and below expectations. We also measured actual affective reactions after the bowlers had completed their games. Findings suggest that subjects both expect and experience a loss-averse, expectation-based value function broadly of the Prospect Theory type. They also anticipate, and experience, an amplifying effect of outcome surprise, though they underestimate its size. We argue that such underestimation, together with overtight prediction ranges, may expose subjects to much larger affective variation with outcome variability than they anticipate.
AB - In decisions under uncertainty, decision makers confront two uncertainties: the uncertain linkage between actions and outcomes and the uncertain linkage between these outcomes and his or her affective responses to them. The two studies reported here examine affective responses to expected and unexpected outcomes in various settings. In Study 1, a scenario-based laboratory experiment (N = 149), we examined subjects' predicted responses to a range of outcomes, as a function of how surprising the outcome was. Study 2, a field study (N = 127), involved the expectations of bowlers about their scores in an upcoming game and about their responses to various outcomes at, above, and below expectations. We also measured actual affective reactions after the bowlers had completed their games. Findings suggest that subjects both expect and experience a loss-averse, expectation-based value function broadly of the Prospect Theory type. They also anticipate, and experience, an amplifying effect of outcome surprise, though they underestimate its size. We argue that such underestimation, together with overtight prediction ranges, may expose subjects to much larger affective variation with outcome variability than they anticipate.
KW - Affect
KW - Decision making
KW - Outcome
KW - Prediction
KW - Surprise
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0013122912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0013122912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/obhd.2000.2939
DO - 10.1006/obhd.2000.2939
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0013122912
SN - 0749-5978
VL - 85
SP - 211
EP - 225
JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
IS - 2
ER -