TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod (continuous light) with alternating air temperature for production of tomato plug transplants in a closed system
AU - Ohyama, Katsumi
AU - Manabe, Koji
AU - Omura, Yoshitaka
AU - Kozai, Toyoki
AU - Kubota, Chieri
PY - 2005/4
Y1 - 2005/4
N2 - To evaluate the potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod for transplant production in a closed system, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plug transplants were grown for 17 days either ander a 24-hour photoperiod with a photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 200 μmol·m -2·s-1 or under a 16-hour photoperiod with a PPF of 300 μmol·m-2·s-1, resulting in the same daily integrated PPF (17.3 mol·m-2). Air temperatures were alternated between 28°C during the first 16 hours and 16°C for the subsequent 8 hours of each day. Fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area were 41%, 25%, and 64% greater, respectively, under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. Physiological disorders (e.g., chlorosis and/or necrosis) were not observed under the 24-hour photoperiod, probably due to the alternating air temperature. Floral development of plants originating from both treatments did not differ significantly. Electric energy use efficiency of the closed system was 9% greater under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. These results suggest that using a 24-hour photoperiod with relatively low PPF can reduce both initial and operational costs for transplant production in a closed system due to the reduction in the number of lamps.
AB - To evaluate the potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod for transplant production in a closed system, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plug transplants were grown for 17 days either ander a 24-hour photoperiod with a photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 200 μmol·m -2·s-1 or under a 16-hour photoperiod with a PPF of 300 μmol·m-2·s-1, resulting in the same daily integrated PPF (17.3 mol·m-2). Air temperatures were alternated between 28°C during the first 16 hours and 16°C for the subsequent 8 hours of each day. Fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area were 41%, 25%, and 64% greater, respectively, under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. Physiological disorders (e.g., chlorosis and/or necrosis) were not observed under the 24-hour photoperiod, probably due to the alternating air temperature. Floral development of plants originating from both treatments did not differ significantly. Electric energy use efficiency of the closed system was 9% greater under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. These results suggest that using a 24-hour photoperiod with relatively low PPF can reduce both initial and operational costs for transplant production in a closed system due to the reduction in the number of lamps.
KW - Electric energy
KW - Floral development
KW - Lycopersicon esculentum
KW - Physiological disorders
KW - Use efficiency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14244256173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14244256173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21273/hortsci.40.2.374
DO - 10.21273/hortsci.40.2.374
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:14244256173
SN - 0018-5345
VL - 40
SP - 374
EP - 377
JO - HortScience
JF - HortScience
IS - 2
ER -