Postoperative pain assessment and analgesic administration in Native American patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Elizabeth Lee, Mary Teeple, Naina Bagrodia, Jack Hannallah, Nazhone P. Yazzie, William J. Adamas-Rappaport

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ethnic disparities in pain assessment and analgesic administration following surgery have received little attention in the surgery literature. We noted that our Native American patients were less likely than others to complain of pain. A retrospective chart review of 21 Native American patients and a control group who underwent outpatient, elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Native American patients had a statistically lower numeric pain score (mean, 6.5; 95% CI, 3.6-9.4) than non-Native American patients (mean, 8.1; 95% CI, 6.3-9.9; t38=2.63; P<.05). Native American patients also received less post-surgical analgesic (mean, 7.4; 95% CI, 4.0-10.8) than non-Native American patients (mean, 11.2; 95% CI, 7.2-15.2; t38=3.07; P<.01). Medical staff attending Native American patients should be aware that response to some scales to assess pain may not reflect accurately the degree of pain experienced.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-93
Number of pages3
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume148
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Postoperative pain assessment and analgesic administration in Native American patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this