Position on laparoscopic liver surgery

Joseph F. Buell, Daniel Cherqui, David A. Geller, Nicholas O'Rourke, David Iannitti, Ibrahim Dagher, Alan J. Koffron, Mark Thomas, Brice Gayet, Ho Seong Han, Go Wakabayashi, Giulio Belli, Hironori Kaneko, Chen Guo Ker, Olivier Scatton, Alexis Laurent, Eddie K. Abdalla, Prosanto Chaudhury, Erik Dutson, Clark GamblinMichael D'Angelica, David Nagorney, Giuliano Testa, Daniel Labow, Derrik Manas, Ronnie T. Poon, Heidi Nelson, Robert Martin, Bryan Clary, Wright C. Pinson, John Martinie, Jean Nicolas Vauthey, Robert Goldstein, Sasan Roayaie, David Barlet, Joseph Espat, Michael Abecassis, Myrddin Rees, Yuman Fong, Kelly M. McMasters, Christoph Broelsch, Ron Busuttil, Jacques Belghiti, Steven Strasberg, Ravi S. Chari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1248 Scopus citations


Objective: To summarize the current world position on laparoscopic liver surgery. Summary Background Data: Multiple series have reported on the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver surgery. Small and medium sized procedures have become commonplace in many centers, while major laparoscopic liver resections have been performed with efficacy and safety equaling open surgery in highly specialized centers. Although the field has begun to expand rapidly, no consensus meeting has been convened to discuss the evolving field of laparoscopic liver surgery. Methods: On November 7 to 8, 2008, 45 experts in hepatobiliary surgery were invited to participate in a consensus conference convened in Louisville, KY, US. In addition, over 300 attendees were present from 5 continents. The conference was divided into sessions, with 2 moderators assigned to each, so as to stimulate discussion and highlight controversies. The format of the meeting varied from formal presentation of experiential data to expert opinion debates. Written and video records of the presentations were produced. Specific areas of discussion included indications for surgery, patient selection, surgical techniques, complications, patient safety, and surgeon training. Results: The consensus conference used the terms pure laparoscopy, handassisted laparoscopy, and the hybrid technique to define laparoscopic liver procedures. Currently acceptable indications for laparoscopic liver resection are patients with solitary lesions, 5 cm or less, located in liver segments 2 to 6. The laparoscopic approach to left lateral sectionectomy should be considered standard practice. Although all types of liver resection can be performed laparoscopically, major liver resections (eg, right or left hepatectomies) should be reserved for experienced surgeons facile with more advanced laparoscopic hepatic resections. Conversion should be performed for difficult resections requiring extended operating times, and for patient safety, and should be considered prudent surgical practice rather than failure. In emergent situations, efforts should be made to control bleeding before converting to a formal open approach. Utilization of a hand assist or hybrid technique may be faster, safer, and more efficacious. Indications for surgery for benign hepatic lesions should not be widened simply because the surgery can be done laparoscopically. Although data presented on colorectal metastases did not reveal an adverse effect of the laparoscopic approach on oncological outcomes in terms of margins or survival, adequacy of margins and ability to detect occult lesions are concerns. The pure laparoscopic technique of left lateral sectionectomy was used for adult to child donation while the hybrid approach has been the only one reported to date in the case of adult to adult right lobe donation. Laparoscopic liver surgery has not been tested by controlled trials for efficacy or safety. A prospective randomized trial appears to be logistically prohibitive; however, an international registry should be initiated to document the role and safety of laparoscopic liver resection. Conclusions: Laparoscopic liver surgery is a safe and effective approach to the management of surgical liver disease in the hands of trained surgeons with experience in hepatobiliary and laparoscopic surgery. National and international societies, as well as governing boards, should become involved in the goal of establishing training standards and credentialing, to ensure consistent standards and clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)825-830
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of surgery
Issue number5
StatePublished - Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Position on laparoscopic liver surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this