TY - JOUR
T1 - Pollen reentrainment
T2 - Contributions to the pollen rain in an arid environment
AU - O’Rourke, Mary Kay
N1 - Funding Information:
This work uas supported by EPA Grant R805318 and NIH SCOR Grant HL14136. Although the research described in this article has been funded wholly or in part by the US. Environmental Protection Agency through grant no. R805318 to Michael D. Lebowitz, Ph.D., it has not been subjected to the Agency’s rcquired peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred. Special thanks to Paul S. Martin, Michael D. Lebowitz, Owen K. Davis, Karl Flessa, Raymond hl. Turner, Marvin Stokes, and Willard Van Asdall who of- fered valuable advise and cntism on earlier drafts of the manuscript.
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - Atmospheric pollen was sampled from native vegetation at the Desert Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA, using a Burkard trap. The pollen counts disclosed two conditions of pollen preservation (1) pollen with the intine visible, and (2) pollen characterized either by loss of the intine or by a crumpled exine. The former was thought to be freshly discharged, the latter to be reentrained from depositional surfaces. 11% of the atmospheric pollen collected was reentrained. Winds accompanying convective summer storms enhanced pollen reentrainment. Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthus and Gramineae, morphologically smooth pollen taxa, totaled 86% of the reentrained pollen during 1981-82. Pollen from soils appeared to be a major source of reentrained pollen. The amount of reentrainment varied seasonally; reentrainment concentration was greatest during the summer, whereas, the percent of reentrained pollen was greatest during the winter. Pollen reentrainment has the potential to bias fossil pollen records in arid environments particularly in seasons when primary pollen production is low, e.g. winter.
AB - Atmospheric pollen was sampled from native vegetation at the Desert Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA, using a Burkard trap. The pollen counts disclosed two conditions of pollen preservation (1) pollen with the intine visible, and (2) pollen characterized either by loss of the intine or by a crumpled exine. The former was thought to be freshly discharged, the latter to be reentrained from depositional surfaces. 11% of the atmospheric pollen collected was reentrained. Winds accompanying convective summer storms enhanced pollen reentrainment. Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthus and Gramineae, morphologically smooth pollen taxa, totaled 86% of the reentrained pollen during 1981-82. Pollen from soils appeared to be a major source of reentrained pollen. The amount of reentrainment varied seasonally; reentrainment concentration was greatest during the summer, whereas, the percent of reentrained pollen was greatest during the winter. Pollen reentrainment has the potential to bias fossil pollen records in arid environments particularly in seasons when primary pollen production is low, e.g. winter.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025589804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025589804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00173139009427745
DO - 10.1080/00173139009427745
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0025589804
SN - 0017-3134
VL - 29
SP - 147
EP - 152
JO - GRANA
JF - GRANA
IS - 2
ER -