Abstract
I examine how particular social arrangements and incentive structures encourage the honest reporting of experimental results and minimize fraudulent scientific work. In particular I investigate how epistemic communities can achieve this goal by promoting members to police the community. Using some basic tools from game theory, I explore a simple model in which scientists both conduct research and have the option of investigating the findings of their peers. I find that this system of peer policing can in many cases ensure high levels of honesty.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 403-416 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Episteme |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History and Philosophy of Science