TY - JOUR
T1 - Physics-Informed Neural Networks for 2nd order ODEs with sharp gradients
AU - De Florio, Mario
AU - Schiassi, Enrico
AU - Calabrò, Francesco
AU - Furfaro, Roberto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/1/15
Y1 - 2024/1/15
N2 - In this work, four different methods based on Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for solving Differential Equations (DE) are compared: Classic-PINN that makes use of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to approximate the DE solution;Deep-TFC improves the efficiency of classic-PINN by employing the constrained expression from the Theory of Functional Connections (TFC) so to analytically satisfy the DE constraints;PIELM that improves the accuracy of classic-PINN by employing a single-layer NN trained via Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) algorithm;X-TFC, which makes use of both constrained expression and ELM. The last has been recently introduced to solve challenging problems affected by discontinuity, learning solutions in cases where the other three methods fail. The four methods are compared by solving the boundary value problem arising from the 1D Steady-State Advection–Diffusion Equation for different values of the diffusion coefficient. The solutions of the DEs exhibit steep gradients as the value of the diffusion coefficient decreases, increasing the challenge of the problem.
AB - In this work, four different methods based on Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for solving Differential Equations (DE) are compared: Classic-PINN that makes use of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to approximate the DE solution;Deep-TFC improves the efficiency of classic-PINN by employing the constrained expression from the Theory of Functional Connections (TFC) so to analytically satisfy the DE constraints;PIELM that improves the accuracy of classic-PINN by employing a single-layer NN trained via Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) algorithm;X-TFC, which makes use of both constrained expression and ELM. The last has been recently introduced to solve challenging problems affected by discontinuity, learning solutions in cases where the other three methods fail. The four methods are compared by solving the boundary value problem arising from the 1D Steady-State Advection–Diffusion Equation for different values of the diffusion coefficient. The solutions of the DEs exhibit steep gradients as the value of the diffusion coefficient decreases, increasing the challenge of the problem.
KW - Extreme learning machine
KW - Functional interpolation
KW - Least-squares
KW - Physics-Informed Neural Networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162091340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85162091340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cam.2023.115396
DO - 10.1016/j.cam.2023.115396
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85162091340
SN - 0377-0427
VL - 436
JO - Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
JF - Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
M1 - 115396
ER -