TY - JOUR
T1 - Physician nurse care
T2 - A new use of UMLS to measure professional contribution: Are we talking about the same patient a new graph matching algorithm?
AU - Boyd, Andrew D.
AU - Dunn Lopez, Karen
AU - Lugaresi, Camillo
AU - Macieira, Tamara
AU - Sousa, Vanessa
AU - Acharya, Sabita
AU - Balasubramanian, Abhinaya
AU - Roussi, Khawllah
AU - Keenan, Gail M.
AU - Lussier, Yves A.
AU - Li, Jianrong ‘John’
AU - Burton, Michel
AU - Di Eugenio, Barbara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s)
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Background: Physician and nurses have worked together for generations; however, their language and training are vastly different; comparing and contrasting their work and their joint impact on patient outcomes is difficult in light of this difference. At the same time, the EHR only includes the physician perspective via the physician-authored discharge summary, but not nurse documentation. Prior research in this area has focused on collaboration and the usage of similar terminology. Objective: The objective of the study is to gain insight into interprofessional care by developing a computational metric to identify similarities, related concepts and differences in physician and nurse work. Methods: 58 physician discharge summaries and the corresponding nurse plans of care were transformed into Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs). MedLEE, a Natural Language Processing (NLP) program, extracted “physician terms” from free-text physician summaries. The nursing plans of care were constructed using the HANDS © nursing documentation software. HANDS © utilizes structured terminologies: nursing diagnosis (NANDA-I), outcomes (NOC), and interventions (NIC) to create “nursing terms”. The physician's and nurse's terms were compared using the UMLS network for relatedness, overlaying the physician and nurse terms for comparison. Our overarching goal is to provide insight into the care, by innovatively applying graph algorithms to the UMLS network. We reveal the relationships between the care provided by each professional that is specific to the patient level. Results: We found that only 26% of patients had synonyms (identical UMLS CUIs) between the two professions’ documentation. On average, physicians’ discharge summaries contain 27 terms and nurses’ documentation, 18. Traversing the UMLS network, we found an average of 4 terms related (distance less than 2) between the professions, leaving most concepts as unrelated between nurse and physician care. Conclusion: Our hypothesis that physician's and nurse's practice domains are markedly different is supported by the preliminary, quantitative evidence we found. Leveraging the UMLS network and graph traversal algorithms, allows us to compare and contrast nursing and physician care on a single patient, enabling a more complete picture of patient care. We can differentiate professional contributions to patient outcomes and related and divergent concepts by each profession.
AB - Background: Physician and nurses have worked together for generations; however, their language and training are vastly different; comparing and contrasting their work and their joint impact on patient outcomes is difficult in light of this difference. At the same time, the EHR only includes the physician perspective via the physician-authored discharge summary, but not nurse documentation. Prior research in this area has focused on collaboration and the usage of similar terminology. Objective: The objective of the study is to gain insight into interprofessional care by developing a computational metric to identify similarities, related concepts and differences in physician and nurse work. Methods: 58 physician discharge summaries and the corresponding nurse plans of care were transformed into Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs). MedLEE, a Natural Language Processing (NLP) program, extracted “physician terms” from free-text physician summaries. The nursing plans of care were constructed using the HANDS © nursing documentation software. HANDS © utilizes structured terminologies: nursing diagnosis (NANDA-I), outcomes (NOC), and interventions (NIC) to create “nursing terms”. The physician's and nurse's terms were compared using the UMLS network for relatedness, overlaying the physician and nurse terms for comparison. Our overarching goal is to provide insight into the care, by innovatively applying graph algorithms to the UMLS network. We reveal the relationships between the care provided by each professional that is specific to the patient level. Results: We found that only 26% of patients had synonyms (identical UMLS CUIs) between the two professions’ documentation. On average, physicians’ discharge summaries contain 27 terms and nurses’ documentation, 18. Traversing the UMLS network, we found an average of 4 terms related (distance less than 2) between the professions, leaving most concepts as unrelated between nurse and physician care. Conclusion: Our hypothesis that physician's and nurse's practice domains are markedly different is supported by the preliminary, quantitative evidence we found. Leveraging the UMLS network and graph traversal algorithms, allows us to compare and contrast nursing and physician care on a single patient, enabling a more complete picture of patient care. We can differentiate professional contributions to patient outcomes and related and divergent concepts by each profession.
KW - Health informatics
KW - Nursing documentation
KW - Physician documentation
KW - Professional discontinuity
KW - UMLS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042870817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042870817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.02.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 29602435
AN - SCOPUS:85042870817
SN - 1386-5056
VL - 113
SP - 63
EP - 71
JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics
JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics
ER -