Physical science research needed to evaluate the viability and risks of marine cloud brightening

Graham Feingold, Virendra P. Ghate, Lynn M. Russell, Peter Blossey, Will Cantrell, Matthew W. Christensen, Michael S. Diamond, Andrew Gettelman, Franziska Glassmeier, Edward Gryspeerdt, James Haywood, Fabian Hoffmann, Colleen M. Kaul, Matthew Lebsock, Allison C. McComiskey, Daniel T. McCoy, Yi Ming, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Anna Possner, Prasanth PrabhakaranPatricia K. Quinn, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Raymond A. Shaw, Clare E. Singer, Armin Sorooshian, Velle Toll, Jessica S. Wan, Robert Wood, Fan Yang, Jianhao Zhang, Xue Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is the deliberate injection of aerosol particles into shallow marine clouds to increase their reflection of solar radiation and reduce the amount of energy absorbed by the climate system. From the physical science perspective, the consensus of a broad international group of scientists is that the viability of MCB will ultimately depend on whether observations and models can robustly assess the scale-up of local-to-global brightening in today’s climate and identify strategies that will ensure an equitable geographical distribution of the benefits and risks associated with projected regional changes in temperature and precipitation. To address the physical science knowledge gaps required to assess the societal implications of MCB, we propose a substantial and targeted program of research—field and laboratory experiments, monitoring, and numerical modeling across a range of scales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbereadi8594
JournalScience Advances
Volume10
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 22 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physical science research needed to evaluate the viability and risks of marine cloud brightening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this