TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase II trial and cost analysis of fazarabine in advanced non-small cell carcinoma of the lung
T2 - A southwest oncology group study
AU - Williaon, Stephen K.
AU - Crowley, John J.
AU - Livingston, Robert B.
AU - Panella, Timothy J.
AU - Goodwin, John Wendall
PY - 1995/3
Y1 - 1995/3
N2 - Background Fazarabine is a novel nucleoside with broad spectrum pre-clinical activity and was chosen for study in patients with incurable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. The expenses associated with investigational treatment have been assumed to be more than what would occur with conventional therapy, however, data are limited. Methods Twently-three patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were treated with fazarabine. Fazarabine was administered as a 72 hour continuous infusion, at 2.0 mg/M2/hour. A cost analysis of treatment was calculated for patients treated in Springfield, MO. Results There were no responses (0%, 95% confidence interval=0–15%) and median survival was 8 months. An analysis of the cost of treatment in the 4 patients treated in Springfield, MO, was compared to the costs of treatment with 4 cycles of cisplatinum and etoposide. There were no significant differences in costs for patients treated with the investigational agent as compared with conventional chemotherapy. Conclusions Fazarabine has no demonstrable activity in patients with metastatic non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Treatment with this agent in an investigational setting was no more expensive than treatment with conventional chemotherapy.
AB - Background Fazarabine is a novel nucleoside with broad spectrum pre-clinical activity and was chosen for study in patients with incurable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. The expenses associated with investigational treatment have been assumed to be more than what would occur with conventional therapy, however, data are limited. Methods Twently-three patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were treated with fazarabine. Fazarabine was administered as a 72 hour continuous infusion, at 2.0 mg/M2/hour. A cost analysis of treatment was calculated for patients treated in Springfield, MO. Results There were no responses (0%, 95% confidence interval=0–15%) and median survival was 8 months. An analysis of the cost of treatment in the 4 patients treated in Springfield, MO, was compared to the costs of treatment with 4 cycles of cisplatinum and etoposide. There were no significant differences in costs for patients treated with the investigational agent as compared with conventional chemotherapy. Conclusions Fazarabine has no demonstrable activity in patients with metastatic non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Treatment with this agent in an investigational setting was no more expensive than treatment with conventional chemotherapy.
KW - cost analysis
KW - fazarabine
KW - lung neoplasms
KW - nucleosides
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029157676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029157676&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF02614223
DO - 10.1007/BF02614223
M3 - Article
C2 - 7499111
AN - SCOPUS:0029157676
SN - 0167-6997
VL - 13
SP - 67
EP - 71
JO - Investigational New Drugs: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Clinicians and Scientists
JF - Investigational New Drugs: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Clinicians and Scientists
IS - 1
ER -