TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of prognostic markers in the prediction of wound healing or amputation among patients with foot ulcers in diabetes
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Forsythe, Rachael O.
AU - Apelqvist, Jan
AU - Boyko, Edward J.
AU - Fitridge, Robert
AU - Hong, Joon Pio
AU - Katsanos, Konstantinos
AU - Mills, Joseph L.
AU - Nikol, Sigrid
AU - Reekers, Jim
AU - Venermo, Maarit
AU - Zierler, R. Eugene
AU - Schaper, Nicolaas C.
AU - Hinchliffe, Robert J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the following external experts for their review of our PICOs for clinical relevance: Stephan Morbach (Germany), Heidi Corcoran (Hongkong), Vilma Urbančič (Slovenia), Rica Tanaka (Japan), Florian Dick (Switzerland), Taha Wassila (Egypt), Abdul Basit (Pakistan), Yamile Jubiz (Colombia), Sriram Narayanan (Singapore), and Eduardo Alvarez (Cuba). We would like to thank Sicco Bus (on behalf of the IWGDF editorial board) and Kim Houlind (independent external expert) for their peer review of the manuscript. We would also like to thank Jack Brownrigg for his input in the previous version of this systematic review.
Funding Information:
Production of the 2019 IWGDF Guidelines was supported by unrestricted grants from Molnlycke Healthcare, Acelity, ConvaTec, Urgo Medical, Edixomed, Klaveness, Reapplix, Podartis, Aurealis, SoftOx, Woundcare Circle, and Essity. These sponsors did not have any communication related to the systematic reviews of the literature or related to the guidelines with working group members during the writing of the guidelines and have not seen any guideline or guideline‐related document before publication. All individual conflict of interest statement of authors of this guideline can be found at https://iwgdfguidelines.org/about-iwgdf-guidelines/biographies/ .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes, foot ulceration, and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are difficult to predict. The prediction of important clinical outcomes, such as wound healing and major amputation, would be a valuable tool to help guide management and target interventions for limb salvage. Despite the existence of a number of classification tools, no consensus exists as to the most useful bedside tests with which to predict outcome. We here present an updated systematic review from the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot, comprising 15 studies published between 1980 and 2018 describing almost 6800 patients with diabetes and foot ulceration. Clinical examination findings as well as six non-invasive bedside tests were evaluated for their ability to predict wound healing and amputation. The most useful tests to inform on the probability of healing were skin perfusion pressure ≥ 40 mmHg, toe pressure ≥ 30 mmHg, or TcPO2 ≥ 25 mmHg. With these thresholds, all of these tests increased the probability of healing by greater than 25% in at least one study. To predict major amputation, the most useful tests were ankle pressure < 50 mmHg, ABI < 0.5, toe pressure < 30 mmHg, and TcPO2 < 25 mmHg, which increased the probability of major amputation by greater than 25%. These indicative values may be used as a guide when deciding which patients are at highest risk for poor outcomes and should therefore be evaluated for revascularization at an early stage. However, this should always be considered within the wider context of important co-existing factors such as infection, wound characteristics, and other comorbidities.
AB - Clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes, foot ulceration, and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are difficult to predict. The prediction of important clinical outcomes, such as wound healing and major amputation, would be a valuable tool to help guide management and target interventions for limb salvage. Despite the existence of a number of classification tools, no consensus exists as to the most useful bedside tests with which to predict outcome. We here present an updated systematic review from the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot, comprising 15 studies published between 1980 and 2018 describing almost 6800 patients with diabetes and foot ulceration. Clinical examination findings as well as six non-invasive bedside tests were evaluated for their ability to predict wound healing and amputation. The most useful tests to inform on the probability of healing were skin perfusion pressure ≥ 40 mmHg, toe pressure ≥ 30 mmHg, or TcPO2 ≥ 25 mmHg. With these thresholds, all of these tests increased the probability of healing by greater than 25% in at least one study. To predict major amputation, the most useful tests were ankle pressure < 50 mmHg, ABI < 0.5, toe pressure < 30 mmHg, and TcPO2 < 25 mmHg, which increased the probability of major amputation by greater than 25%. These indicative values may be used as a guide when deciding which patients are at highest risk for poor outcomes and should therefore be evaluated for revascularization at an early stage. However, this should always be considered within the wider context of important co-existing factors such as infection, wound characteristics, and other comorbidities.
KW - amputation
KW - diabetes
KW - diabetic foot
KW - peripheral artery disease
KW - prognosis
KW - ulcer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078753324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078753324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/dmrr.3278
DO - 10.1002/dmrr.3278
M3 - Article
C2 - 32176442
AN - SCOPUS:85078753324
SN - 1520-7552
VL - 36
JO - Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
JF - Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
IS - S1
M1 - e3278
ER -