TY - JOUR
T1 - Oscillatory responses to semantic and syntactic violations
AU - Kielar, Aneta
AU - Meltzer, Jed A.
AU - Moreno, Sylvain
AU - Alain, Claude
AU - Bialystok, Ellen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
PY - 2014/12/20
Y1 - 2014/12/20
N2 - EEG studies employing time–frequency analysis have revealed changes in theta and alpha power in a variety of language and memory tasks. Semantic and syntactic violations embedded in sentences evoke well-known ERPs, but little is known about the oscillatory responses to these violations. We investigated oscillatory responses to both kinds of violations, while monolingual and bilingual participants performed an acceptability judgment task. Both violations elicited power decreases (eventrelated desynchronization, ERD) in the 8–30 Hz frequency range, but with different scalp topographies. In addition, semantic anomalies elicited power increases (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the 1–5 Hz frequency band. The 1–5 Hz ERS was strongly phase-locked to stimulus onset and highly correlated with time domain averages, whereas the 8–30 Hz ERD response varied independently of these. In addition, the results showed that language expertise modulated 8–30 Hz ERD for syntactic violations as a function of the executive demands of the task. When the executive function demands were increased using a grammaticality judgment task, bilinguals but not monolinguals demonstrated reduced 8–30 Hz ERD for syntactic violations. These findings suggest a putative role of the 8–30 Hz ERD response as a marker of linguistic processing that likely represents a separate neural process from those underlying ERPs.
AB - EEG studies employing time–frequency analysis have revealed changes in theta and alpha power in a variety of language and memory tasks. Semantic and syntactic violations embedded in sentences evoke well-known ERPs, but little is known about the oscillatory responses to these violations. We investigated oscillatory responses to both kinds of violations, while monolingual and bilingual participants performed an acceptability judgment task. Both violations elicited power decreases (eventrelated desynchronization, ERD) in the 8–30 Hz frequency range, but with different scalp topographies. In addition, semantic anomalies elicited power increases (event-related synchronization, ERS) in the 1–5 Hz frequency band. The 1–5 Hz ERS was strongly phase-locked to stimulus onset and highly correlated with time domain averages, whereas the 8–30 Hz ERD response varied independently of these. In addition, the results showed that language expertise modulated 8–30 Hz ERD for syntactic violations as a function of the executive demands of the task. When the executive function demands were increased using a grammaticality judgment task, bilinguals but not monolinguals demonstrated reduced 8–30 Hz ERD for syntactic violations. These findings suggest a putative role of the 8–30 Hz ERD response as a marker of linguistic processing that likely represents a separate neural process from those underlying ERPs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931033428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931033428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/jocn_a_00670
DO - 10.1162/jocn_a_00670
M3 - Article
C2 - 24893735
AN - SCOPUS:84931033428
SN - 0898-929X
VL - 26
SP - 2840
EP - 2862
JO - Journal of cognitive neuroscience
JF - Journal of cognitive neuroscience
IS - 12
ER -