Abstract
Using organizational justice as a guiding framework, the authors studied perceptions of affirmative action programs by presumed beneficiaries. Three conceptual issues were addressed: (a) the content of different affirmative action plans; (b) the 3-way interaction among distributive, procedural, and interactional justice; and (c) the distinction between outcome favorability and distributive justice. These ideas were tested with a sample of Black engineering students who responded to 1 of 6 plans. Participants distinguished among the various plans, with some policies being viewed as more fair than others. In addition, a 3-way interaction among the 3 types of organizational justice was observed. Specifically, the 2-way interaction between distributive and interactional fairness was only significant when procedural justice was low. Implications for organizational justice and for the design of affirmative action programs are discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1168-1184 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Psychology |
Volume | 90 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2005 |
Keywords
- Affirmative action
- Diversity
- Organizational justice
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology