TY - GEN
T1 - Organizational assessment models for enterprise transformation
AU - Nathan Perkins, L.
AU - Valerdi, Ricardo
AU - Nightingale, Deborah
AU - Rifkin, Stan
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Organizational assessment is becoming increasingly important, both as a cross-time and cross-industry measurement and as a guiding force in enterprise transformation. Assessments provide crucial information about strengths, areas for improvement and potential investment strategies for achieving performance benefits. As performance is being recognized as a complex and multifaceted construct, assessment tools seek to incorporate and reflect a holistic measurement of performance across multiple dimensions such as stakeholder value, leadership, culture and quality. With a growing range of tools available, this paper examines four prevalent assessment strategies as examples of different approaches to organizational assessment. We compare these tools in terms of use cases, principles measured, outputs and contextual factors. Due to a lack of causal evidence between the principles assessed and objective evidence of improved organizational performance, organizations should utilize the assessment tool that best aligns with key transformation values or goals. By committing to a relevant and useful assessment tool and fully integrating it into strategic processes, organizations are able to achieve the internal knowledge and historical data necessary to improve performance and drive ongoing transformation efforts.
AB - Organizational assessment is becoming increasingly important, both as a cross-time and cross-industry measurement and as a guiding force in enterprise transformation. Assessments provide crucial information about strengths, areas for improvement and potential investment strategies for achieving performance benefits. As performance is being recognized as a complex and multifaceted construct, assessment tools seek to incorporate and reflect a holistic measurement of performance across multiple dimensions such as stakeholder value, leadership, culture and quality. With a growing range of tools available, this paper examines four prevalent assessment strategies as examples of different approaches to organizational assessment. We compare these tools in terms of use cases, principles measured, outputs and contextual factors. Due to a lack of causal evidence between the principles assessed and objective evidence of improved organizational performance, organizations should utilize the assessment tool that best aligns with key transformation values or goals. By committing to a relevant and useful assessment tool and fully integrating it into strategic processes, organizations are able to achieve the internal knowledge and historical data necessary to improve performance and drive ongoing transformation efforts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877889868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877889868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84877889868
SN - 9781617388873
T3 - 20th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2010
SP - 809
EP - 823
BT - 20th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2010
T2 - 20th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering, INCOSE 2010
Y2 - 12 July 2010 through 15 July 2010
ER -