TY - JOUR
T1 - Options for control of reactive power by distributed photovoltaic generators
AU - Turitsyn, Konstantin
AU - Šulc, Petr
AU - Backhaus, Scott
AU - Chertkov, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received February 1, 2011; accepted February 11, 2011. Date of current version May 17, 2011. The work of P. Sˇulc and M. Chertkov was partially supported by NMC via an NSF collaborative Grant CCF-0829945 on BHarnessing Statistical Physics for Computing and Communications.[ Research at LANL was carried out under the auspices of the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract DE C52-06NA25396. K. Turitsyn is with the CNLS and Theoretical Divison, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). P. Sˇulc is with the New Mexico Consortium, Los Alamos, NM 87544 USA. He is also with Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic (e-mail: [email protected]). S. Backhaus is with the Materials, Physics and Applications Division, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA (e-mail: [email protected]). M. Chertkov is with the CNLS and Theoretical Divison, Los Alamos National Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA. He is also with the New Mexico Consortium, Los Alamos, NM 87544 USA (e-mail: [email protected]).
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - High-penetration levels of distributed photovoltaic (PV) generation on an electrical distribution circuit present several challenges and opportunities for distribution utilities. Rapidly varying irradiance conditions may cause voltage sags and swells that cannot be compensated by slowly responding utility equipment resulting in a degradation of power quality. Although not permitted under current standards for interconnection of distributed generation, fast-reacting, VAR-capable PV inverters may provide the necessary reactive power injection or consumption to maintain voltage regulation under difficult transient conditions. As side benefit, the control of reactive power injection at each PV inverter provides an opportunity and a new tool for distribution utilities to optimize the performance of distribution circuits, e.g., by minimizing thermal losses. We discuss and compare via simulation various design options for control systems to manage the reactive power generated by these inverters. An important design decision that weighs on the speed and quality of communication required is whether the control should be centralized or distributed (i.e., local). In general, we find that local control schemes are able to maintain voltage within acceptable bounds. We consider the benefits of choosing different local variables on which to control and how the control system can be continuously tuned between robust voltage control, suitable for daytime operation when circuit conditions can change rapidly, and loss minimization better suited for nighttime operation.
AB - High-penetration levels of distributed photovoltaic (PV) generation on an electrical distribution circuit present several challenges and opportunities for distribution utilities. Rapidly varying irradiance conditions may cause voltage sags and swells that cannot be compensated by slowly responding utility equipment resulting in a degradation of power quality. Although not permitted under current standards for interconnection of distributed generation, fast-reacting, VAR-capable PV inverters may provide the necessary reactive power injection or consumption to maintain voltage regulation under difficult transient conditions. As side benefit, the control of reactive power injection at each PV inverter provides an opportunity and a new tool for distribution utilities to optimize the performance of distribution circuits, e.g., by minimizing thermal losses. We discuss and compare via simulation various design options for control systems to manage the reactive power generated by these inverters. An important design decision that weighs on the speed and quality of communication required is whether the control should be centralized or distributed (i.e., local). In general, we find that local control schemes are able to maintain voltage within acceptable bounds. We consider the benefits of choosing different local variables on which to control and how the control system can be continuously tuned between robust voltage control, suitable for daytime operation when circuit conditions can change rapidly, and loss minimization better suited for nighttime operation.
KW - Distributed generation
KW - feeder line
KW - photovoltaic (PV) power generation
KW - power flow
KW - voltage control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956350391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956350391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/JPROC.2011.2116750
DO - 10.1109/JPROC.2011.2116750
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79956350391
SN - 0018-9219
VL - 99
SP - 1063
EP - 1073
JO - Proceedings of the IEEE
JF - Proceedings of the IEEE
IS - 6
M1 - 5768094
ER -