TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing the Gas Absorption/Chemical Reaction Method for Measuring Air–Water Interfacial Area in Porous Media
AU - Lyu, Ying
AU - Brusseau, Mark L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The first author was supported by a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council during their stay at the University of Arizona. We thank Asma El Ouni for her assistance.
Funding Information:
Funding Information This research was supported by the NIEHS Superfund Research Program (P42 ES04940).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - The gas absorption/chemical reaction (GACR) method developed in chemical engineering to measure gas–fluid interface in reactor systems is adapted for natural porous geologic media. Several series of column experiments were conducted using model glass beads and a natural sand to determine optimal operational conditions for measuring air–water interfacial area with the adapted method. The impacts of operational variables were investigated, including liquid and gas volumetric flow rates, solution concentration, and temperature. The results show that the magnitude of the measured air–water interfacial area is dependent upon all of these variables to greater or lesser degrees. Larger fluid flow rates promote distribution and mixing of the fluids, enhancing absorption and reaction. Increasing the concentration of NaOH in solution reduced the relative utilization of NaOH, promoting pseudo-first-order reaction conditions. The results elucidate the optimal operational conditions for application of the method to geomedia systems.
AB - The gas absorption/chemical reaction (GACR) method developed in chemical engineering to measure gas–fluid interface in reactor systems is adapted for natural porous geologic media. Several series of column experiments were conducted using model glass beads and a natural sand to determine optimal operational conditions for measuring air–water interfacial area with the adapted method. The impacts of operational variables were investigated, including liquid and gas volumetric flow rates, solution concentration, and temperature. The results show that the magnitude of the measured air–water interfacial area is dependent upon all of these variables to greater or lesser degrees. Larger fluid flow rates promote distribution and mixing of the fluids, enhancing absorption and reaction. Increasing the concentration of NaOH in solution reduced the relative utilization of NaOH, promoting pseudo-first-order reaction conditions. The results elucidate the optimal operational conditions for application of the method to geomedia systems.
KW - Air–water interfacial area
KW - Chemical reaction
KW - Fluid–fluid interface
KW - Gas absorption
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034818752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034818752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11270-017-3637-5
DO - 10.1007/s11270-017-3637-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85034818752
VL - 228
JO - Water, Air, and Soil Pollution
JF - Water, Air, and Soil Pollution
SN - 0049-6979
IS - 12
M1 - 451
ER -