TY - JOUR
T1 - On the relationships between size and abundance in plants
T2 - beyond forest communities
AU - Dillon, Kelsey T.
AU - Henderson, Amanda N.
AU - Lodge, Alexandra G.
AU - Hamilton, Nina I.
AU - Sloat, Lindsey L.
AU - Enquist, Brian J.
AU - Price, Charles A.
AU - Kerkhoff, Andrew J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Kate Boicourt, Amy Strieter, Amy Kessler, Kaleb Keyserling, Ellen Thompson, Peter Gaube, and Evan Economo for field assistance, and M.H.H. Stevens for comments on an earlier draft. KTD, AGL, NIH, and AJK were supported by the Kenyon College Summer Science Scholars program. ANH was supported by an NSF REU grant to RMBL. AJK was supported by NSF grant DEB-1556651.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors.
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - The inverse relationship between size and abundance is a well-documented pattern in forests, and the form of size–density relationships depends on the balance between growth and mortality rates in the community. Traditionally, studies of plant size distributions have focused on single-species populations and forests, but here we examine diverse communities dominated by plants with varied life histories, including grasses, forbs, shrubs, and succulents. In particular, we test whether the parameters of the individual size distribution differ systematically across community types, whether they fit the contrasting predictions of metabolic or demographic theories, and whether they share a common cross-community scaling relationship with forest communities and crop populations. All thirteen of our study sites better fit the predictions of demographic equilibrium theory, but interestingly, fits of both demographic and metabolic models showed little systematic variation across community types, despite large differences in environmental conditions and dominant life forms. Finally, analysis of the cross-community scaling relationship demonstrates that natural and restored non-forest communities conform to patterns of size and abundance observed among forest, plantation, and crop systems. Taken together, our results suggest that common ecological mechanisms govern plant community size structure across broad environmental gradients, regardless of the dominant plant life forms or limiting resources.
AB - The inverse relationship between size and abundance is a well-documented pattern in forests, and the form of size–density relationships depends on the balance between growth and mortality rates in the community. Traditionally, studies of plant size distributions have focused on single-species populations and forests, but here we examine diverse communities dominated by plants with varied life histories, including grasses, forbs, shrubs, and succulents. In particular, we test whether the parameters of the individual size distribution differ systematically across community types, whether they fit the contrasting predictions of metabolic or demographic theories, and whether they share a common cross-community scaling relationship with forest communities and crop populations. All thirteen of our study sites better fit the predictions of demographic equilibrium theory, but interestingly, fits of both demographic and metabolic models showed little systematic variation across community types, despite large differences in environmental conditions and dominant life forms. Finally, analysis of the cross-community scaling relationship demonstrates that natural and restored non-forest communities conform to patterns of size and abundance observed among forest, plantation, and crop systems. Taken together, our results suggest that common ecological mechanisms govern plant community size structure across broad environmental gradients, regardless of the dominant plant life forms or limiting resources.
KW - demographic equilibrium
KW - energetic equivalence
KW - metabolic theory of ecology
KW - scaling
KW - self-thinning
KW - size structure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074515465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074515465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ecs2.2856
DO - 10.1002/ecs2.2856
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074515465
SN - 2150-8925
VL - 10
JO - Ecosphere
JF - Ecosphere
IS - 9
M1 - e02856
ER -