TY - GEN
T1 - On Parameters Defining Active Flow Control
AU - Oshima, Emile K.
AU - Gharib, Morteza
AU - Reichert, Johannes
AU - Wygnanski, Israel J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - There is a conceptual difference between Boundary Layer Control (BLC) and Active Flow Control (AFC). The former aims to compensate for frictional losses in the boundary layer, while the latter seeks to exploit instabilities in the flow to alter its character. The momentum coefficient _` has been the parameter of choice to characterize boundary layer energization and circulation enhancement by blowing. While it has proven useful in cataloging some data, it is not a universally valid single parameter describing the complex flow over wings. Furthermore, the jet velocity and density required for its calculation are difficult to measure in situ, necessitating unrealistic assumptions or extensive calibrations. The best quantity to be used is one that defines the energy requirements of an entire system while realizing its lack of uniqueness. Experimental investigations on a thick flapped airfoil and a simple swept wing of different sweep angles and aspect ratios demonstrate that such a quantity is more suitable for design purposes because it shifts the perspective from detailed jet flow to system needs. Although this figure-of-merit approach black boxes flow interaction details between the jet and the freestream, system-based coefficients can still provide various physical insights in their capacity as cataloguing parameters.
AB - There is a conceptual difference between Boundary Layer Control (BLC) and Active Flow Control (AFC). The former aims to compensate for frictional losses in the boundary layer, while the latter seeks to exploit instabilities in the flow to alter its character. The momentum coefficient _` has been the parameter of choice to characterize boundary layer energization and circulation enhancement by blowing. While it has proven useful in cataloging some data, it is not a universally valid single parameter describing the complex flow over wings. Furthermore, the jet velocity and density required for its calculation are difficult to measure in situ, necessitating unrealistic assumptions or extensive calibrations. The best quantity to be used is one that defines the energy requirements of an entire system while realizing its lack of uniqueness. Experimental investigations on a thick flapped airfoil and a simple swept wing of different sweep angles and aspect ratios demonstrate that such a quantity is more suitable for design purposes because it shifts the perspective from detailed jet flow to system needs. Although this figure-of-merit approach black boxes flow interaction details between the jet and the freestream, system-based coefficients can still provide various physical insights in their capacity as cataloguing parameters.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123888635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123888635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2021-2855
DO - 10.2514/6.2021-2855
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85123888635
SN - 9781624106101
T3 - AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA AVIATION Forum 2021
BT - AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA AVIATION Forum 2021
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA Aviation and Aeronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA AVIATION Forum 2021
Y2 - 2 August 2021 through 6 August 2021
ER -