TY - JOUR
T1 - On distinguishing snowfall from rainfall using near-surface atmospheric information
T2 - Comparative analysis, uncertainties and hydrologic importance
AU - Behrangi, Ali
AU - Yin, Xungang
AU - Rajagopal, Seshadri
AU - Stampoulis, Dimitrios
AU - Ye, Hengchun
N1 - Funding Information:
information National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) GRACE, NNH15ZDA001N-GRACE. NASA Energy and Water Cycle Study (NEWS), (NNH13ZDA001N-NEWS). US Department of Agriculture/National Institute of Food & Agriculture. National Science Foundation. Water Sustainability & Climate Program, 1360506/1360507. NASA Weather, NNH13ZDA001N-WEATHER and NASA MIRO NNX15AQ06A.The research described in this article was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The stations data used here are collected from NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/. The study is partially supported by the NASA GRACE and GRACE-FO (NNH15ZDA001NGRACE), NASA Energy and Water Cycle Study (NNH13ZDA001N-NEWS), and NASA Weather (NNH13ZDA001N-WEATHER) awards. Government sponsorship is acknowledged. Seshadri Rajagopal was partially supported by research supported by grant (1360506/1360507) from the Water Sustainability & Climate Program jointly funded by the National Science Foundation and US Department of Agriculture/National Institute of Food & Agriculture.
Funding Information:
The research described in this article was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The stations data used here are collected from NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/. The study is partially supported by the NASA GRACE and GRACE-FO (NNH15ZDA001NGRACE), NASA Energy and Water Cycle Study (NNH13ZDA001N-NEWS), and NASA Weather (NNH13ZDA001N-WEATHER) awards. Government sponsorship is acknowledged. Seshadri Rajagopal was partially supported by research supported by grant (1360506/1360507) from the Water Sustainability & Climate Program jointly funded by the National Science Foundation and US Department of Agriculture/National Institute of Food & Agriculture.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Royal Meteorological Society
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - The accurate estimation of precipitation phase has broad applications. In this study, we compared the skill of using various atmospheric variables and their combinations as predictors in accurately identifying surface precipitation phase, determined uncertainties associated with commonly used fixed temperature thresholds, and explored the sensitivity of hydrologic model output to uncertainty in precipitation phase using two case-studies. The results suggest that among all single predictors, wet-bulb temperature yields the highest skill score for determining precipitation phase and can reduce uncertainties due to regional differences, especially compared to the commonly used near-surface air temperature. However, addition of good-quality near-surface wind speed measurement to dew-point temperature and pressure showed slightly higher skill than wet-bulb temperature. We showed that the scale mismatch between temperature from stations and gridded products can cause large uncertainties in determining precipitation phase, especially in regions with rugged topography. Such uncertainties need to be considered when the relationships developed based on station data are applied to remote-sensing observations and model-generated data to separate rain from snowfall. The sensitivity of hydrologic model outputs to uncertainty in precipitation phase delineation was also assessed over two major basins in California by modifying default near-surface temperatures used in the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model. It was found that regional and scaling uncertainties in determining temperature thresholds can largely influence the accuracy of simulated downstream runoff and snow water equivalent (SWE) (e.g. up to 40% change in SWE for 2 °C shift in temperature threshold). Therefore, to reduce simulation uncertainties, it is important to improve rain–snow partitioning methods, consider regional variabilities in determining temperature thresholds, and perform the analysis at the highest possible resolutions to mitigate scale-related uncertainties.
AB - The accurate estimation of precipitation phase has broad applications. In this study, we compared the skill of using various atmospheric variables and their combinations as predictors in accurately identifying surface precipitation phase, determined uncertainties associated with commonly used fixed temperature thresholds, and explored the sensitivity of hydrologic model output to uncertainty in precipitation phase using two case-studies. The results suggest that among all single predictors, wet-bulb temperature yields the highest skill score for determining precipitation phase and can reduce uncertainties due to regional differences, especially compared to the commonly used near-surface air temperature. However, addition of good-quality near-surface wind speed measurement to dew-point temperature and pressure showed slightly higher skill than wet-bulb temperature. We showed that the scale mismatch between temperature from stations and gridded products can cause large uncertainties in determining precipitation phase, especially in regions with rugged topography. Such uncertainties need to be considered when the relationships developed based on station data are applied to remote-sensing observations and model-generated data to separate rain from snowfall. The sensitivity of hydrologic model outputs to uncertainty in precipitation phase delineation was also assessed over two major basins in California by modifying default near-surface temperatures used in the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model. It was found that regional and scaling uncertainties in determining temperature thresholds can largely influence the accuracy of simulated downstream runoff and snow water equivalent (SWE) (e.g. up to 40% change in SWE for 2 °C shift in temperature threshold). Therefore, to reduce simulation uncertainties, it is important to improve rain–snow partitioning methods, consider regional variabilities in determining temperature thresholds, and perform the analysis at the highest possible resolutions to mitigate scale-related uncertainties.
KW - hydrology
KW - rain
KW - remote sensing
KW - snowfall
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051004504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051004504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/qj.3240
DO - 10.1002/qj.3240
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051004504
SN - 0035-9009
VL - 144
SP - 89
EP - 102
JO - Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
JF - Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
ER -