Abstract
This essay responds to David Enoch’s “The Disorder of Public Reason,” published in a previous issue of Ethics. I seek to set the record straight on several of the many charges Enoch makes. More importantly, having clarified some of the more basic points, I make some preliminary efforts at identifying when his brand of moral realism and my version of public reason differ—and, perhaps, where they are more compatible than one might think.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1078-1095 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Ethics |
| Volume | 125 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 14 2015 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy