TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel oral anticoagulants and trauma
T2 - The results of a prospective American association for the surgery of trauma multi-institutional trial
AU - AAST Multicenter Prospective Observational Study of Trauma Patients on Novel Oral Anticoagulants Study Group
AU - Kobayashi, Leslie
AU - Barmparas, Galinos
AU - Bosarge, Patrick
AU - Brown, Carlos V.
AU - Bukur, Marko
AU - Carrick, Matthew M.
AU - Catalano, Richard D.
AU - Holly-Nicolas, Jan
AU - Inaba, Kenji
AU - Kaminski, Stephen
AU - Klein, Amanda L.
AU - Kopelman, Tammy
AU - Ley, Eric J.
AU - Martinez, Ericca M.
AU - Moore, Forrest O.
AU - Murry, Jason
AU - Nirula, Raminder
AU - Paul, Douglas
AU - Quick, Jacob
AU - Rivera, Omar
AU - Schreiber, Martin
AU - Coimbra, Raul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background: The number of anticoagulated trauma patients is increasing. Trauma patients on warfarin have been found to have poor outcomes, particularly after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). However, the effect of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAs) on trauma outcomes is unknown. We hypothesized that patients on NOAs would have higher rates of ICH, ICH progression, and death compared with patients on traditional anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents. Methods: This was a prospective observational trial across 16 trauma centers. Inclusion criteria was any trauma patient admitted on aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. Demographic data, admission vital signs, mechanism of injury, injury severity scores, laboratory values, and interventions were collected. Outcomes included ICH, progression of ICH, and death. Results: A total of 1,847 patientswere enrolled between July 2013 and June 2015. Mean agewas 74.9 years (SD ± 13.8), 46% were female, 77% were non-Hispanic white. At least one comorbidity was reported in 94% of patients. Blunt trauma accounted for 99% of patients, and the median Injury Severity Score was 9 (interquartile range, 4-14). 50% of patients were on antiplatelet agents, 33%on warfarin, 10% on NOAs, and 7% on combination therapy or subcutaneous agents. Patients taking NOAs were not at higher risk for ICH on univariate (24% vs. 31%) or multivariate analysis (incidence rate ratio, 0.78; confidence interval 0.61-1.01, p = 0.05). Compared with all other agents, patients on aspirin (90%, 81 mg; 10%, 325 mg) had the highest rate (35%) and risk (incidence rate ratio, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.13-1.43; p < 0.001) of ICH. Progression of ICH occurred in 17% of patients and was not different between medication groups. Study mortality was 7% and was not significantly different between groups on univariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Patients on NOAs were not at higher risk for ICH, ICH progression, or death.
AB - Background: The number of anticoagulated trauma patients is increasing. Trauma patients on warfarin have been found to have poor outcomes, particularly after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). However, the effect of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAs) on trauma outcomes is unknown. We hypothesized that patients on NOAs would have higher rates of ICH, ICH progression, and death compared with patients on traditional anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents. Methods: This was a prospective observational trial across 16 trauma centers. Inclusion criteria was any trauma patient admitted on aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. Demographic data, admission vital signs, mechanism of injury, injury severity scores, laboratory values, and interventions were collected. Outcomes included ICH, progression of ICH, and death. Results: A total of 1,847 patientswere enrolled between July 2013 and June 2015. Mean agewas 74.9 years (SD ± 13.8), 46% were female, 77% were non-Hispanic white. At least one comorbidity was reported in 94% of patients. Blunt trauma accounted for 99% of patients, and the median Injury Severity Score was 9 (interquartile range, 4-14). 50% of patients were on antiplatelet agents, 33%on warfarin, 10% on NOAs, and 7% on combination therapy or subcutaneous agents. Patients taking NOAs were not at higher risk for ICH on univariate (24% vs. 31%) or multivariate analysis (incidence rate ratio, 0.78; confidence interval 0.61-1.01, p = 0.05). Compared with all other agents, patients on aspirin (90%, 81 mg; 10%, 325 mg) had the highest rate (35%) and risk (incidence rate ratio, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.13-1.43; p < 0.001) of ICH. Progression of ICH occurred in 17% of patients and was not different between medication groups. Study mortality was 7% and was not significantly different between groups on univariate or multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Patients on NOAs were not at higher risk for ICH, ICH progression, or death.
KW - Anticoagulation
KW - Injury
KW - Oral anticoagulants
KW - Trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018298656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018298656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001414
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000001414
M3 - Article
C2 - 28431413
AN - SCOPUS:85018298656
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 82
SP - 827
EP - 835
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 5
ER -