TY - JOUR
T1 - Nondescriptivist Cognitivism
T2 - Framework for a New Metaethic
AU - Horgan, Terence E
AU - Timmons, Mark
PY - 2000/7
Y1 - 2000/7
N2 - We propose a metaethical view that combines the cognitivist idea that moral judgments are genuine beliefs and moral utterances express genuine assertions with the idea that such beliefs and utterances are nondescriptive in their overall content. This sort of view has not been recognized among the standard metaethical options because it is generally assumed that all genuine beliefs and assertions must have descriptive content. We challenge this assumption and thereby open up conceptual space for a new kind of metaethical view. In developing our brand of nondescriptivist cognitivism we do the following: (1) articulate a conception of belief (and assertion) that does not require the overall declarative content of beliefs (and assertions) to be descriptive content; (2) make a case for the independent plausibility of this conception of belief and assertion; and (3) argue that our view, formulated in a way that draws upon the proposed conception of belief, has significant comparative advantages over descriptivist forms of cognitivism.
AB - We propose a metaethical view that combines the cognitivist idea that moral judgments are genuine beliefs and moral utterances express genuine assertions with the idea that such beliefs and utterances are nondescriptive in their overall content. This sort of view has not been recognized among the standard metaethical options because it is generally assumed that all genuine beliefs and assertions must have descriptive content. We challenge this assumption and thereby open up conceptual space for a new kind of metaethical view. In developing our brand of nondescriptivist cognitivism we do the following: (1) articulate a conception of belief (and assertion) that does not require the overall declarative content of beliefs (and assertions) to be descriptive content; (2) make a case for the independent plausibility of this conception of belief and assertion; and (3) argue that our view, formulated in a way that draws upon the proposed conception of belief, has significant comparative advantages over descriptivist forms of cognitivism.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980019510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980019510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/05568640009485069
DO - 10.1080/05568640009485069
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84980019510
SN - 0556-8641
VL - 29
SP - 121
EP - 153
JO - Philosophical Papers
JF - Philosophical Papers
IS - 2
ER -