Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy for Central Sleep Apnea in Patients with Heart Failure; A Multisite, Double-Blind, Sham-controlled Randomized Clinical Trial (LOFT-HF)

  • Susan Redline
  • , Dongdong Li
  • , Shahrokh Javaheri
  • , Sanjay R. Patel
  • , Sairam Parthasarathy
  • , James C. Fang
  • , Lee K. Brown
  • , Mark Dunlap
  • , M. Safwan Badr
  • , Neomi Shah
  • , Luqi Chi
  • , Ruckshanda Majid
  • , Mihaela Teodorescu
  • , Garrick Stewart
  • , Eileen Hsich
  • , Tamar Polonsky
  • , Justin Vader
  • , Maryl R. Johnson
  • , Dennis Auckley
  • , Henry Klar Yaggi
  • Andrew Kao, Ali Azarbarzin, Raichel Alex, Michael Rueschman, Lisa Wolfe, Daniel J. Gottlieb, Scott A. Sands, Phyllis C. Zee, Reena Mehra, Babak Mokhlesi, Rami Khayat, Eldrin F. Lewis, William T. Abraham, Rui Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Rationale: There are insufficient data to inform the management of central sleep apnea (CSA) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Nocturnal oxygen therapy (NOT) has been postulated to benefit CSA patients with HFrEF but has not been rigorously studied. Objectives: To compare NOT with sham NOT (control) in heart failure (HF) patients receiving guideline-based HF therapy on the composite outcome of first occurrence of either mortality due to any cause, a lifesaving cardiovascular intervention, or an unplanned hospitalization for worsening HF, together with other secondary outcomes. Methods: A multisite, double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from September 2019 to December 2021, when the study was terminated prematurely because of slow enrollment. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to analyze time-to-event outcomes. Results: Ninety-eight participants (mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 27.869.6%; mean central apnea–hypopnea index, 30.6618.2 events/h) were randomized and followed for an average of 10.866.3 months. A total of 22 events met the criteria for the primary composite endpoint. The hazard ratio comparing the NOT group with the control group according to time to first event, adjusted for the stratification factor (hospitalization for HF in the past 12 mo and/or elevated outpatient brain natriuretic peptide or Nterminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide concentration) was 1.46 (95% confidence interval, 0.65–3.29). No group differences in changes in patient-reported outcomes (HF-specific quality of life [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire], sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment [Patient-reported OutcomesMeasurement Information System], generic health [EQ-5D], ormood [Patient Health Questionnaire-8]) were observed at 6 months. Polysomnography showed improved indices of sleep-disordered breathing (apnea–hypopnea index, central apnea–hypopnea index, and time at oxygen saturation,90%) with oxygen compared with room air. Conclusions: Although NOT improves CSA and overnight oxygenation, this prematurely terminated study does not provide support for the clinical effectiveness of NOT in patients with CSA and HFrEF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1951-1960
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume22
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • central sleep apnea
  • clinical trial
  • heart failure
  • hunter-Cheyne-Stokes breathing
  • oxygen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy for Central Sleep Apnea in Patients with Heart Failure; A Multisite, Double-Blind, Sham-controlled Randomized Clinical Trial (LOFT-HF)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this