TY - JOUR
T1 - Negotiating technology implementation
T2 - An empirical investigation of a website introduction
AU - Griffith, Terri L.
AU - Tansik, David A.
AU - Benson, Lehman
N1 - Funding Information:
Many thanks to Jackson Nickerson and John Watts for their comments on an earlier draft. This research was supported in part by University of Arizona grant # 210680.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Negotiated implementation is suggested as a cogent approach to meeting user and implementer needs, and thus, to increasing technology implementation. Negotiated implementation is expected to have its effect through three well-known dimensions: ease of use, usefulness, and commitment. The efficacy of negotiated implementation is tested in the context of a university-based field study of World Wide Web site use. Empirical support is found for the negotiated implementation approach. Implications and future research related to both theory and application are provided.
AB - Negotiated implementation is suggested as a cogent approach to meeting user and implementer needs, and thus, to increasing technology implementation. Negotiated implementation is expected to have its effect through three well-known dimensions: ease of use, usefulness, and commitment. The efficacy of negotiated implementation is tested in the context of a university-based field study of World Wide Web site use. Empirical support is found for the negotiated implementation approach. Implications and future research related to both theory and application are provided.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036102926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036102926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1014596623389
DO - 10.1023/A:1014596623389
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036102926
SN - 0926-2644
VL - 11
SP - 1
EP - 22
JO - Group Decision and Negotiation
JF - Group Decision and Negotiation
IS - 1
ER -