TY - JOUR
T1 - Negative and positive party identification in post-communist countries
AU - Rose, Richard
AU - Mishler, William
N1 - Funding Information:
The New Democracies Barometer survey data analysed here was organized by the Paul Lazarsfeld Society, Vienna, with the assistance of grants from the Austrian Federal Ministry for Science and Research and the Austrian National Bank. Dr Christian Haerpfer and Evgeny Tikhomirov were very helpful in the initial collection and processing of the data.
PY - 1998/6
Y1 - 1998/6
N2 - To understand party identification in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe, we need to give equal attention to negative partisanship - the identification of a party that an individual would never vote for - as well as positive party identification. Our institutionalist approach posits that in a one-party state the Party will be distrusted, and socialization will encourage people to form a negative party identification. Survey data from 1995 in Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovenia show 77% have a negative identification and only 30% are positive; this produces a fourfold typology of open, closed, apathetic and negative partisans. Discriminant function analysis is used to identify political, economic and social structure influences on this typology of partisanship. Negative partisanship is then distinguished between the rejection of ideologically polarizing parties, whether Communist, right-wing, reformist or religious, or the rejection of parties appealing exclusively to a limited segment of the electorate, such as a minority ethnic group. Discriminant function analysis identifies leading influences on the reaction against particular types of parties. The conclusion considers whether post-Communist citizens are more likely to move from negative to positive partisanship or become knowledgeable sceptics, and concludes that the development of knowledgeable scepticism is more likely.
AB - To understand party identification in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe, we need to give equal attention to negative partisanship - the identification of a party that an individual would never vote for - as well as positive party identification. Our institutionalist approach posits that in a one-party state the Party will be distrusted, and socialization will encourage people to form a negative party identification. Survey data from 1995 in Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovenia show 77% have a negative identification and only 30% are positive; this produces a fourfold typology of open, closed, apathetic and negative partisans. Discriminant function analysis is used to identify political, economic and social structure influences on this typology of partisanship. Negative partisanship is then distinguished between the rejection of ideologically polarizing parties, whether Communist, right-wing, reformist or religious, or the rejection of parties appealing exclusively to a limited segment of the electorate, such as a minority ethnic group. Discriminant function analysis identifies leading influences on the reaction against particular types of parties. The conclusion considers whether post-Communist citizens are more likely to move from negative to positive partisanship or become knowledgeable sceptics, and concludes that the development of knowledgeable scepticism is more likely.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031792316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031792316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00016-X
DO - 10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00016-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0031792316
SN - 0261-3794
VL - 17
SP - 217
EP - 234
JO - Electoral Studies
JF - Electoral Studies
IS - 2
ER -