TY - JOUR
T1 - Nanotechnology knowledge diffusion
T2 - Measuring the impact of the research networking and a strategy for improvement
AU - Liu, Xuan
AU - Jiang, Shan
AU - Chen, Hsinchun
AU - Larson, Catherine A.
AU - Roco, Mihail C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (CMMI-1057624 and CMMI-1249210), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Number: 71101053, 61104139, 71171131, and 71103021). The last co-author was supported by the Directorate of Engineering, NSF.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA).
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Given the global increase in public funding for nanotechnology research and development, it is even more important to support projects with promising return on investment. A main return is the benefit to other researchers and to the entire field through knowledge diffusion, invention, and innovation. The social network of researchers is one of the channels through which this happens. This study considers the scientific publication network in the field of nanotechnology, and evaluates how knowledge diffusion through coauthorship and citations is affected in large institutions by the location and connectivity of individual researchers in the network. The relative position and connectivity of a researcher is measured by various social network metrics, including degree centrality, Bonacich Power centrality, structural holes, and betweenness centrality. Leveraging the Cox regression model, we analyzed the temporal relationships between knowledge diffusion and social network measures of researchers in five leading universities in the United States using papers published from 2000 to 2010. The results showed that the most significant effects on knowledge diffusion in the field of nanotechnology were from the structural holes of the network and the degree centrality of individual researchers. The data suggest that a researcher has potential to perform better in knowledge creation and diffusion on boundary-spanning positions between different communities and when he or she has a high level of connectivity in the knowledge network. These observations may lead to improved strategies in planning, conducting, and evaluating multidisciplinary nanotechnology research. The paper also identifies the researchers who made most significant contributions to nanotechnology knowledge diffusion in the networks of five leading U.S. universities.
AB - Given the global increase in public funding for nanotechnology research and development, it is even more important to support projects with promising return on investment. A main return is the benefit to other researchers and to the entire field through knowledge diffusion, invention, and innovation. The social network of researchers is one of the channels through which this happens. This study considers the scientific publication network in the field of nanotechnology, and evaluates how knowledge diffusion through coauthorship and citations is affected in large institutions by the location and connectivity of individual researchers in the network. The relative position and connectivity of a researcher is measured by various social network metrics, including degree centrality, Bonacich Power centrality, structural holes, and betweenness centrality. Leveraging the Cox regression model, we analyzed the temporal relationships between knowledge diffusion and social network measures of researchers in five leading universities in the United States using papers published from 2000 to 2010. The results showed that the most significant effects on knowledge diffusion in the field of nanotechnology were from the structural holes of the network and the degree centrality of individual researchers. The data suggest that a researcher has potential to perform better in knowledge creation and diffusion on boundary-spanning positions between different communities and when he or she has a high level of connectivity in the knowledge network. These observations may lead to improved strategies in planning, conducting, and evaluating multidisciplinary nanotechnology research. The paper also identifies the researchers who made most significant contributions to nanotechnology knowledge diffusion in the networks of five leading U.S. universities.
KW - Academic research ecosystem
KW - Boundary-spanning position
KW - Centrality measures
KW - Connectivity measure
KW - Cox regression model
KW - Knowledge diffusion
KW - Nanoscale science and engineering
KW - Research evaluation
KW - Social network
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906640204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906640204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11051-014-2613-x
DO - 10.1007/s11051-014-2613-x
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84906640204
SN - 1388-0764
VL - 16
JO - Journal of Nanoparticle Research
JF - Journal of Nanoparticle Research
IS - 9
M1 - 2613
ER -