Multiscale and multijurisdictional Geodesign: The Coastal Region of Georgia, USA

Rosanna Rivero; Alison Smith; Brian Orland; Jon Calabria; Hrishikesh Ballal; Carl Steinitz; Ryan Perkl; Lupita McClenning; Hunter Key

Multiscale and multijurisdictional Geodesign: The Coastal Region of Georgia, USA

Rosanna Rivero, Alison Smith, Brian Orland, Jon Calabria, Hrishikesh Ballal, Carl Steinitz, Ryan Perkl, Lupita McClenning, Hunter Key

Planning Degree Program

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

This project offers an innovative use of a collaborative geodesign framework, to address issues of multiscale, multi-jurisdictional planning, by evaluating the impacts from designs developed and evaluated at the county and regional level in real-time. Stakeholders organized in ten county teams and two regional, conducted simultaneous evaluation at the county and regional scale. Following second and third design iterations, individual county teams negotiated among themselves and with the two regional teams, evaluating issues of conservation and development in the coast of Georgia. Two dynamic models, one for ecological connectivity and the other for land use allocation were integrated and also incorporated with the most recent green infrastructure national datasets. A single negotiated regional plan was the result of this geodesign effort based on Steinitz'geodesing framework.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	42-49
Number of pages	8
Journal	Landscapes
Volume	19
Issue number	1
State	Published - Mar 1 2017

Keywords

Collaborative Design
Collaborative Planning
Geodesign
Geospatial Impact Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Architecture
Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

@article{3217ef498d8a434d9f02afa563d8a3a8,

title = "Multiscale and multijurisdictional Geodesign: The Coastal Region of Georgia, USA",

abstract = "This project offers an innovative use of a collaborative geodesign framework, to address issues of multiscale, multi-jurisdictional planning, by evaluating the impacts from designs developed and evaluated at the county and regional level in real-time. Stakeholders organized in ten county teams and two regional, conducted simultaneous evaluation at the county and regional scale. Following second and third design iterations, individual county teams negotiated among themselves and with the two regional teams, evaluating issues of conservation and development in the coast of Georgia. Two dynamic models, one for ecological connectivity and the other for land use allocation were integrated and also incorporated with the most recent green infrastructure national datasets. A single negotiated regional plan was the result of this geodesign effort based on Steinitz'geodesing framework.",

keywords = "Collaborative Design, Collaborative Planning, Geodesign, Geospatial Impact Models",

author = "Rosanna Rivero and Alison Smith and Brian Orland and Jon Calabria and Hrishikesh Ballal and Carl Steinitz and Ryan Perkl and Lupita McClenning and Hunter Key",

year = "2017",

month = mar,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "19",

pages = "42--49",

journal = "Landscapes",

issn = "1492-9600",

publisher = "American Society of Landscape Architects",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiscale and multijurisdictional Geodesign

T2 - The Coastal Region of Georgia, USA

AU - Rivero, Rosanna

AU - Smith, Alison

AU - Orland, Brian

AU - Calabria, Jon

AU - Ballal, Hrishikesh

AU - Steinitz, Carl

AU - Perkl, Ryan

AU - McClenning, Lupita

AU - Key, Hunter

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - This project offers an innovative use of a collaborative geodesign framework, to address issues of multiscale, multi-jurisdictional planning, by evaluating the impacts from designs developed and evaluated at the county and regional level in real-time. Stakeholders organized in ten county teams and two regional, conducted simultaneous evaluation at the county and regional scale. Following second and third design iterations, individual county teams negotiated among themselves and with the two regional teams, evaluating issues of conservation and development in the coast of Georgia. Two dynamic models, one for ecological connectivity and the other for land use allocation were integrated and also incorporated with the most recent green infrastructure national datasets. A single negotiated regional plan was the result of this geodesign effort based on Steinitz'geodesing framework.

AB - This project offers an innovative use of a collaborative geodesign framework, to address issues of multiscale, multi-jurisdictional planning, by evaluating the impacts from designs developed and evaluated at the county and regional level in real-time. Stakeholders organized in ten county teams and two regional, conducted simultaneous evaluation at the county and regional scale. Following second and third design iterations, individual county teams negotiated among themselves and with the two regional teams, evaluating issues of conservation and development in the coast of Georgia. Two dynamic models, one for ecological connectivity and the other for land use allocation were integrated and also incorporated with the most recent green infrastructure national datasets. A single negotiated regional plan was the result of this geodesign effort based on Steinitz'geodesing framework.

KW - Collaborative Design

KW - Collaborative Planning

KW - Geodesign

KW - Geospatial Impact Models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034734311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034734311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85034734311

SN - 1492-9600

VL - 19

SP - 42

EP - 49

JO - Landscapes

JF - Landscapes

IS - 1

ER -

Multiscale and multijurisdictional Geodesign: The Coastal Region of Georgia, USA

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this