Abstract
ABSTRACT: Multicriterion decision making (MCDM) techniques were used to analyze a groundwater contamination management problem from the viewpoint of conflicting multiple objectives. The groundwater management model was used to find a compromise strategy for trading off fresh water supply, containment of the waste, and total pumping cost in a hypothetical confined aquifer affected by previous waste disposal action. A groundwater flow model was used to formulate the hydraulic constraints. A linear system model was used to describe drawdown and velocity as functions of the decision variables which were pumping rates. The model determines the pumping location and rates. A modified c‐constraint method was used to generate the set of nondominated solutions which were the alternative compromise strategies. Three different MCDM techniques, Compromise programming (CP), ELECTRA II and MCQA II, were used to select a “satisficing” alternative. Analysis of the results showed that, although these techniques follow different principles, the same preferred strategies were reached. Also, it was noticed that maintaining high groundwater velocities is expensive and difficult. In order to meet a two year target date, large amounts of water had to be pumped. Therefore, rapid restoration results in large pumping volumes and high costs.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 33-43 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1992 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- compromise strategy
- decision variables
- multicriterion
- ranking techniques
- response function
- velocity control
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecology
- Water Science and Technology
- Earth-Surface Processes